At first glance the patriarchy appears to be thriving. More than 90% of presidents and prime ministers are male, as are nearly all big corporate bosses. Men dominate finance, technology, films, sports, music and even stand-up comedy. In much of the world they still enjoy social and legal privileges simply because they have a Y chromosome. So it might seem odd to worry about the plight of men.
Yet there is plenty of cause for concern. One group in particular is suffering. Poorly educated men in rich countries have had difficulty coping with the enormous changes in the labour market and the home over the past half-century. (46) As technology and trade have devalued brawn, less-educated men have struggled to find a role in the workplace. Women,on the other hand, are surging into expanding sectors such as health care and education, helped by their superior skills. As education has become more important, boys have also fallen behind girls in school.
Those on the political left tend to focus on economics. Shrinking job opportunities for men, they say, are entrenching poverty and destroying families. (47) In America pay for men with only a high-school certificate fell by 21% in real terms between 1979 and 2013: for women with similar qualifications it rose by 3%. Around a fifth of working-age American men with only a high-school diploma have no job.
Those on the right worry about the collapse of the family. The vast majority of women would prefer to have a partner who does his bit both financially and domestically. (48) But they would rather do without one than team up with a lay about, which may be all that is on offer: American men without jobs spend only half as much time on housework and caring for others as do women in the same situation, and much more time watching television.
These two sides often talk past each other. But their explanations are not contradictory: both economics and social change are to blame, and the two causes reinforce each other. Moreover, these problems are likely to get worse. (49)Technology will disrupt more industries, creating benefits for society but rendering workers who fail to update their skills redundant. The OECD, a think-tank, predicts that the absolute number of single-parent households will continue to rise in nearly all rich countries. Boys who grow up without fathers are more likely to have trouble forming lasting relationships, creating a cycle of male dysfunction.
What can be done? Part of the solution lies in a change in cultural attitudes. Politicians need to recognize that boys‘underachievement is a serious problem, and set about fixing it. Some sensible policies that are good for everybody are particularly good for boys. Early-childhood education provides boys with more structure and a better chance of developing verbal and social skills. (50) Countries with successful vocational systems such as Germany have done a better job than Anglo-Saxon countries of motivating non-academic boys and guiding them into jobs, but policymakers need to reinvent vocational education for an age when trainees are more likely to get jobs in hospitals than factories.
The growing equality of the sexes is one of the biggest achievements of the post-war era: people have greater opportunities than ever before to achieve their ambitions regardless of their gender. But some men have failed to cope with this new world. It is time to give them a hand.
现代技术革新和贸易已经使原先的靠劳力形式的肌肉男的价值直线下降, 缺少教育的男性, 不得不在职场中苦苦挣扎, 才能博得一席之地。
在美国, 只有高中学历的男性的实际收入, 从 1979 年到 2013 年减低了 21%, 而同等学历的女性, 在此期间的实际收入却提高了 3%。
她们宁愿单身也不愿随便和一个游手好闲的卢瑟勉强过一辈子, 而这是有依据的: 美国失业男性仅仅只付出同等条件下失业女性的一半的时间来做家务事和照顾彼此的生活, 这些男人会花更多的时间来看电视。
科技将瓦解更多的行业, 为社会创造更多的价值, 但也将使更多的无法升级自身技能的劳动者失业。
有着成功的职业教育系统的国家如德国, 在鼓励男孩去学术化, 重职业化, 并指导他们工作上, 已经做的比起盎格鲁-撒克逊国家而言要好得多了。 但政策制定者应将恢复职业教育的重心放在使受训者更倾向于日后在医院工作而不是在工厂工作这种时代要求上。