单选题
The subject of automation and its role in our economy has taken hold in American public discourse. Technology broadly and automation specifically are dramatically reshaping the way we work. And we need to have a plan for what’s still to come. We don’t have to look further than our own communities to see the devastating impact of automation. From automated warehouses to cashierless grocery stores to neighborhood libraries that offer self-checkout lanes instead of employing real people—automation is increasingly replacing jobs and leaving too few good new jobs behind. The statistics in manufacturing are staggering. Despite the widespread fears about trade, a recent report showed that just 13 percent of jobs lost in manufacturing are due to trade—the rest of the losses have been due to advances in technology. That is why more people are criticizing the ever-increasing role of technology in our economy. Our country is manufacturing more than ever before, but we are doing it with fewer workers. However, it’s not just factories that are seeing losses—software and information technology are also having a dramatic impact on jobs most people think are secure from the forces of a rapidly-changing economy. Something transformative is happening in America that is having an adverse effect on American families. Whether policymakers and politicians admit it or not, workers have made clear their feelings about their economic insecurity and desire to keep good jobs in America. So why are people so insistent on ignoring the perils of automation? They are failing to look ahead at a time when planning for the future is more important than ever. Resisting automation is futile: it is as inevitable as industrialization was before it. I sincerely hope that those who assert that automation will make us more effective and pave the way for new occupations are right, but the reality of automation’s detrimental effects on workers makes me skeptical. No one can currently say where the new jobs are coming from or when, and any sensible company or country should prepare for all alternatives. I’m not overstating the danger: look at what’s happened to the labor force. According to economic research, one in six working-age men, 25-54, doesn’t have a job. Fifty years ago, nearly 100 percent of men that age were working. Women’s labor force participation, meanwhile, has slipped back to the level it was at in the late 1980s. American families and prominent business leaders are aware that there’s a big problem with automation. The value of a college degree is diminishing, and our upward mobility is declining. If we want an economy that allows everyone to be economically secure, we need to start thinking about how we can rightfully address automation.
单选题
What can we observe from the author’s description of our communities?
单选题
What does the passage tell us about American workers in an era of transformation?
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】根据题干中的信息词American workers,答案线索可以定位至第四段最后一句。第四段最后一句指出,不管政策制定者和政客承认与否,工人们已经明确表达出了他们对经济的不安全感和想把好工作留在美国的愿望。选项B中的Vulnerable是对原文their feelings about their economic insecurity and desire to keep good jobs in America的概括,故本题选B。选项A是对该段中的politicians和下段开头的ignoring设置的干扰项,原文并没有政客忽视工人的信息,故排除。C、D两项文中均未提及,故排除。
单选题
What does the author think of automation?
【正确答案】
C
【答案解析】根据题干中的信息词author和think of automation,答案线索可以定位至第五段,该段第四句是作者对自动化的主观评价。第五段第四句中作者讲到,我真诚地希望那些断言自动化将使我们效率更高并为新职业铺平道路的人是正确的。但自动化对工人造成了不利影响,这一现实让我对此持怀疑态度。选项C是对这句话的概括总结,即有人宣称自动化可以提高工作效率,并创造新岗位,但目前事实并非如此,doubtful是对原文skeptical的同义替换,故本题选C。第五段第三句提到,抵制自动化是徒劳的:它就像之前的工业化一样不可避免。选项A复现了原文单词,但曲解了文意,故排除。原文提出,明智的公司或国家应做好准备,而不是自动化为明智的企业提供备选方案,故排除选项B。作者只提到自动化对工人造成了不利影响,但并未提及其不利影响不可避免,故排除选项D。
单选题
What should we attach importance to when dealing with automation?
【正确答案】
C
【答案解析】根据题干中的信息词dealing with automation,以及出题顺序和文章段落顺序基本一致的原则,答案线索定位至最后一段最后一句。最后一段最后一句指出,如果想要一个能让每个人都有经济保障的国家,我们需要开始思考如何正确地解决自动化问题,即解决自动化问题的目标是让人们有经济保障,economic security复现了原文的economically secure,故选项C正确。大学毕业生的工作前景来自前面一句中的“大学学位的价值正在下降”,女性就业机会来自原文第六段末句提到的“女性的劳动参与率已滑落至20世纪80年代末的水平”,社会流动性来自最后一段所说的“我们向上流动的能力正在降低”,而这几方面都是说经济不景气,即人们缺乏经济保障的具体体现,故A、B、D三项均排除。