When the world was a simpler place, the rich were fat, the poor were thin, and right-thinking people worried about how to feed the hungry. Now, in much of the world, the rich are thin, the poor are fat, and right-thinking people are worrying about obesity. Evolution is mostly to blame. It has designed mankind to cope with deprivation, not plenty. People are perfectly tuned to store energy in good years to see them through lean ones. But when bad times never come, they are stuck with that energy, stored around their expanding bellies. Thanks to rising agricultural productivity, lean years are rarer all over the globe. Modern-day Malthusians, who used to draw graphs proving that the world was shortly going to run out of food, have gone rather quiet lately. According to the UN, the number of people short of food fell from 920m in 1980 to 799m 20 years later, even though the world"s population increased by 1. 6 billion over the period. This is mostly a cause for celebration. Mankind has won what was, for most of his time on this planet, his biggest battle: to ensure that he and his offspring had enough to eat. But every silver lining has a cloud, and the consequence of prosperity is a new plague that brings with it a host of interesting policy dilemmas. As a scourge of the modern world, obesity has an image problem. It is easier to associate with Father Christmas than with the four horses of the Apocalypse. But it has a good claim to lumber along beside them, for it is the world"s biggest public-health issue today — the main cause of heart disease, which kills more people these days than AIDS, malaria, war; the principal risk factor in diabetes; heavily implicated in cancer and other diseases. Since the World Health Organisation labeled obesity an "epidemic" in 2000, reports on its fearful consequences have come thick and fast. Will public-health warnings, combined with media pressure, persuade people to get thinner, just as they finally put them off tobacco? Possibly. In the rich world, sales of healthier foods are booming and new figures suggest that over the past year Americans got very slightly thinner for the first time in recorded history. But even if Americans are losing a few ounces, it will be many years before the country solves the health problems caused by half a century"s dining to excess. And, everywhere else in the world, people are still piling on the pounds. That"s why there is now a consensus among doctors that governments should do something to stop them.
单选题 "Malthusians" (Line 1-2, Para. 3) probably held that
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:事实细节题。从第三段第二句话who引导的定语从句中可以看出马尔萨斯主义者的主张。“当代的马尔萨斯主义者过去常常用图表说明世界不久就会断粮”,因此他们最有可能主张[B]“将来食物不足以养活全世界的人口”。[A]出自第二段第一句,是作者的观点;[C]的论断可从第四段推出,但不是马尔萨斯主义者的观点;[D]是联合国的统计数据显示的内容,此三项皆排除。
单选题 It can be inferred from the text that the biggest problem in history is
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:推理判断题。在第三段作者用具体的数字说明尽管人口在膨胀,但缺粮的状况已得到很大改善。随后作者说“这是值得庆祝的功绩。人类赢得了在地球上的大部分时间里的最大规模的战斗:确保他们及其后代有足够的粮食吃”,据此可以推测,史上的最大问题是[C]“没有足够的粮食吃”。
单选题 Why does the author mention Father Christmas and the four horses of the Apocalypse"!
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:推理判断题。圣诞老人和<启示录>中的四匹马出现在第四段第二句,这句话承接上一句,进一步说明肥胖与形象的关系。因此作者说“我们由肥胖联想到圣诞老人要比联想到<启示录>中的四匹马容易”的用意是[B]“表明地球上的人有多胖”。[C]是强干扰项,但是与第四段第三句和第四句比起来,第一句与第二句的关系更为密切,因此排除[C]。
单选题 Why does the author compare smoking with obesity in this text?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:推理判断题。第五段第一句话将肥胖症和吸烟问题相提并论。注意这句话里的public—health warnings和media pressure是劝服人们变得苗条的途径,也是禁烟的途径,而这些途径不见得会对这两个问题起作用,因此作者在这里是想说明肥胖症和戒烟一样是个难题。[A]为答案。
单选题 What does the author mean by "people are still piling on the pounds"?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:语义理解题。做此类题型时要注意联系上下文。分析文章最后两句话可知,people are still piling on the pounds是医生一致认为政府应该采取措施来制止这种情况的原因。既然要“制止”,肯定不是好事,故排除[A];[B]“人们变瘦”和[C]“人们的体重减轻”(lose ounces的意思可从第五段第三句话和第四句话判断出)表达的是同一个意思,故都排除,答案选[D]。pile on the pounds的意思是“体重增加”。