单选题   (1) PICASSO THE PAINTER WE ALL KNOW. Picasso the sculptor? Not so much. But that all changes with "Picasso Sculpture", a once-in-a-lifetime show now at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City through Feb. 7. With more than 140 works from all phases of his career, it magnificently enlarges our view of the great man. It’s literally Picasso in 3-D.  (2) Though there was never a time he wasn’t painting and drawing, for Picasso sculpture was an on-and-off affair. He approached it in intense episodes, any of which might go on for years and each of which was usually devoted to some new practice or material. He worked his way into and out of carved wood, molded clay, welded assemblage, steel-rod constructions, plaster heads, painted ceramics and sheet metal—not rewriting the rules of each medium so much as discarding the very idea that rules were required.  (3) Picasso was perfectly suited to ignore the conventions of sculpture because he never learned them. Schooled from the first as a painter, he never mastered the business end of a chisel or trained to work in clay. So he had no reservations about nontraditional tools like the welding torch or unconventional materials like tin cans, sand and even trash. For a time in the 1950s he would take walks with his then companion Francoise Gilot, who pushed an empty baby carriage that he would fill with whatever caught his eye at the local junkyard.  (4) And because he wasn’t committed to the long traditions of sculpture it was easy for him to take his most radical step—to reconceive sculpture not just as a solid form but also as a framework that traps space, to make voids as palpable as the solids around them. Cubism, the uproar on canvas he started with Georges Braque around 1907, was already a way of exploding form and space in two dimensions. Why not demolish the third?  (5) Thinking that way led him to one of his first and most fundamental breakthroughs, a guitar he produced in paperboard in 1912, then in metal two years later. It was a very new machine, an open assembly of interlocking planes and voids that incorporated emptiness. As a kind of visual paradox the sound hole was actually a solid protrusion—a cylinder that thrust its circular opening toward you. He would make several subsequent versions, including one in 1924 that wasn’t built out of multiple components but sliced and bent from a single sheet of metal—a thing unfolding itself in space. For good measure every version of his guitar also validated the novel idea that an ordinary object, not a person or animal, was a subject fit for sculpture. In 1934 Picasso would take that notion to the limit with Crumpled Paper—a wad of just that, immortalized in plaster. In recent years a number of artists have produced trash bags in solid form. He did it 81 years ago.  (6) Paradox was often central to Picasso’s sculpture. He used forms and materials in ways that contradicted their qualities as we ordinarily understand them—making a solid "hole" or plaster "paper". In 1914 he crafted a series of six bronzes called Glass of Absinthe (苦艾酒) , all identical in form but each painted differently—a transparent glass made from opaque metal. Picasso gave it a certain transparency all the same by cutting two wedge-shaped openings in its side.  (7) Borrowing an idea from the Cubist collage paintings (拼贴画) he and Braque were both making that year—pictures with bits of newsprint or wallpaper glued to the canvas—he also incorporated a spoon into each one, turning the "real" spoon into "art" and drawing the art into the real world. That kind of assemblage was a crucial tactic, pressing humble objects into service as high art. In his 1933 Head of a Warrior, the eyes are repurposed tennis balls.  (8) In the last decades of his life—he was 91 when he died in 1973—Picasso was arguably more interesting as a sculptor than as a painter. In his late canvases there are too many strenuous reimaginings of Velazquez, Poussin, Delacroix—encounters with Old Masters in which the old man didn’t always come out on top. But his sculpture remained vital and original. He devoted years to ceramics, making hundreds of witty painted plates and figures like Vase-. Woman. He also discovered how to scale his work into monumental public displays, like his mysterious steel head in Chicago’s Daley Plaza, a conflation of his wife Jacqueline with their Afghan hound that manages to be both overwhelming and ingratiating.  (9) It’s useful to remember that not all the breakthroughs in 20th century sculpture emerged from Picasso’s fevered brain. He was always aware of and responding to the currents around him: Abstraction, Surrealism and, above all, the work of his lifelong frenemy Matisse. But he opened the way to so many varied approaches that there are stretches of this show that seem to be the work of three or four different artists. The cumulative effect is so powerful that you have to remind yourself this isn’t a group show, a conversation among contemporaries. It’s all just Picasso, talking to himself.
单选题 What can we learn about Picasso according to Para. 2?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】事实细节题。根据题干定位至第二段。该段第二句后半部分说,毕加索在从事雕塑的每一个时段通常都致力于进行一些新的实践或使用新的材料,段落结尾更是说,与其说毕加索改写了每种媒介的规则,还不如说他彻底摒弃了需要遵守规则这一想法,可知毕加索在雕塑时充分体现了创新和创造能力,故D为答案。第二段中没有出现毕加索是否善于使用传统雕塑工具的内容,故排除A;第二段首句指出,毕加索从未间断过作面,故排除B;第二段第二句提到,毕加索集中在一些时段进行雕塑,且其中任何一个时段都可能持续几年,可见这种热情并不是短暂的,故排除C。
单选题 What does "Why not demolish the third" imply in Para.4?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】推理判断题。根据题干定位至第四段。问题句位于第四段最后一句,前文提到,由于毕加索没有受到雕塑长期以来的传统的限制,他很容易重新认识雕塑,不仅将其视为一个实体形式,而且是一个捕捉空间,使空间和周围的固体一样明显的框架。他的这种立体主义理念已经在二维空间,即绘画领域破除了阈限,可知所谓的“破除第三个”指的是在三维空间(即雕塑领域)破除传统,实践新思想,故A为答案。第四段首句指出,毕加索要让空间和周围的固体一样明显,而不是一样成为实体,故排除B;该段第二句说,毕加索用立体主义破除了二维空间,即绘画领域的形式和空间的限制,但并未比较立体主义更适合绘画还是雕塑,故排除c;D误解了exploding form and space in two dimensions的含义,作者的意思是破除限制,而不是终结二维艺术,故排除。
单选题 How does the author present his argument in Para. 6?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】篇章结构题。根据题干定位至第六段。该段第一句提出一个观点,即矛盾常常是毕加索雕塑的核心,随后解释说,他使用形式和材料的方式与我们通常对它们材质的理解相矛盾,而后用毕加索在1914年制作的一个系列铜器作为例证来说明这一观点,故B为答案。该段中作者没有讨论有争议的话题,故排除A;该段也没有提及某个专门定义,故排除C;虽然该段后半部分较为详细地描述了毕加索的一个作品,但它只是作为对本段主题的例证,故排除D。
单选题 Which of the following points does the author emphasize in Para. 9?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】推理判断题。根据题干定位至第九段。该段指出,尽管毕加索并不是20世纪雕塑所有突破的源头,但他总能意识到周围的潮流并对其做出反应,即毕加索在创作时会受到外界潮流的影响,还提到毕加索的个人展览看起来像是几位艺术家的联合展览,由此可以看出,他的雕塑作品吸收了很多其他人的特点,即受到了他人的影响,故C为答案。A是对本段第二句的曲解,该句强调的是毕加索受到其他人的影响,而不是他对其他雕塑家的影响,故排除;本段第三、四句提到,毕加索雕塑的累积效应使这场展览看似是群展,但这并不是说毕加索的作品是集体创作的,故排除B;本段中没有涉及毕加索的独特之处,故排除D。
单选题 Which of the following best explains the author’s evaluation of Picasso as a sculptor?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】观点态度题。作者从第二段开始介绍毕加索作为雕塑家的情况,其中第二句和最后一句提到他的新实践和他摒弃传统规则,第四至六段介绍了他的新理念对传统雕塑的突破,第八段第三句指出,即使到了晚年,他的雕塑仍然具有生命力和原创性,可知C的表述正确,故为答案。A是利用第八段第二句设置的干扰项,原句说毕加索在与绘画大师的对弈中,并不总是能占上风,所指的是绘画领域,而不是雕塑领域,故排除;由第二段可知,毕加索雕塑时使用的材料很多,但并未指出他对哪种材料有所偏爱,故排除B;第八段最后一句提到毕加索将雕塑拓展到公开展示,但并不能据此推断其作品主要用于公开展示,故排除D。