Shortly after dawn on February 17th 2003, the world"s most ambitious road-pricing experiment will start in London. Though cordon toll schemes have been operating in Nor-way for years, and Singapore has an electronic system, no one has ever tried to charge motorists in a city of the size and complexity of London. For decades, transport planners have been demanding that motorists should pay directly for the use of roads. According to the professionals, it is the only way of civilizing cities and restraining the growth of inter-urban traffic. Politicians have mostly turned a deaf ear, fearing that charging for something what was previously free was a quick route to electoral suicide. But London"s initiative suggests that the point where road pricing he-comes generally accepted as the most efficient way to restrain traffic is much nearer than most drivers realize. The mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, has pinned his political reputation on the scheme"s success. If it works, cities around the world will rush to copy it. If it fails, he will be jeered from office when he seeks reelection in 2004. But how will success be judged? The mayor claims that congestion charging will produce £130m in net annual revenues, reduce traffic in central London by 15% and reduce traffic delays by about a quarter. Unfortunately these ambitious targets are unlikely to be met. For a start, the low level at which the charge has been set owes more to politics than traffic planning. Its impact, modest in comparison with the already high £4 an hour on-street parking charges in the area, may be less than anticipated. But most transport experts are cautiously optimistic that it will help improve the capital"s chaotic transport system. As for the mayor, his political prospects look good. Those who drive cars in the center of London during the day are a tiny fraction of the millions who walk or use public transport to get to work. London"s willingness to take the plunge has moved congestion charging from the realm of transport planners into mainstream politics. Yet the low-tech solution it has adopted has been overtaken by modern microwave radio systems allowing cars to communicate with roadside charging units. The next generation of technology will use global positioning satellites (GPS) to track the position of vehicles wherever they are, on a second-to-second basis. The brave new world of paying as you go is not far away. For those who drive in rural areas, the cost will come down. But for motorists who spend most of their time in congested urban areas, travel is rightly going to become much more expensive.
单选题 We can learn from the first paragraph that in the world the scheme of tolling systems is
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:题干问;"从第1自然段我们可以得出,世界上这种交通收费的计划…"。根据原文谈到的"Norway"和"Singapore", 可见很多国家已经采用了这种计划,所以"一点都不新奇"。而选项"毫不可能","为了安全"以及"毫不成功"皆不符合题意。
单选题 The implementation of road pricing in London is primarily intended to
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"伦敦实施道路收费主要的目的是…"。根据原文中道路规划者对实施道路收费能改善交通的态度可见伦敦实施道路收费主要的目的是"控制首都交通的增长"。而选项"给地方财政带来全年收入","除去当街的停车带"以及"为了满足有野心的政治目标"皆不符合题意。
单选题 We learn from the text that traffic planners are more concerned about
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"从原文可以得出,交通规划者更关心的是…"。因为交通规划者赞成道路收费,所以他们更关心的是"加强交通收费"。而选项"伦敦司机的态度","政治立场"以及"复杂的交通收费体系"皆不符合题意。
单选题 According to the text, the mayor of London, Ken Livingstone seems to be very supportive of the congestion charging scheme because of
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"伦敦的市长Ken Livingstone相当支持道路收费完全是为了…"。根据原文第3自然段的阐述,市长支持道路收费是为了"他的政治目的"。而选项"他对交通的兴趣","对政治家们的微弱反应"以及"复杂的问题"皆不符合题意。
单选题 The best title for Sis passage may be
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:题干问:"本文最好的标题是…"。文章的中心是关于交通收费问题,所以选择"道路消费:排队还是付钱?"而选项"更为昂贵的交通旅行","回到大众交通时代"以及"交通规划:进退两难?"皆不是本文的中心,不符合题意。