单选题 {{B}}Text 4{{/B}}
When they were children, Terri Schiavo's brother Bobby accidentally locked her in a suitcase. She tried so hard to get out of the suitcase that she jumped up and down and screamed. The scene predicted, horribly, how she would end, though by that stage she had neither walked nor talked for more than 15 years. By the time she finally died on March 31st, her body had become a box out of which she could not escape.
More than that, it had become a box out of which the United States government, Congress, the president, the governor of Florida and an army of evangelical protestors and bloggers would not let her escape. Her life, whatever its quality, became the property not merely of her husband (who had the legal right to speak for her) and her parents (who had brought her up), but of the courts, the state, and thousands of self-appointed medical and psychological experts across the country.
The chief difference between her case and those of Karen Quinlan and Nancy Cruzan, much earlier victims of Persistent Vegetative State (PVS), was the existence of the internet. When posted videotapes showed Mrs Schiavo apparently smiling and communicating with those around her, doctors called these mere reflex activity, but to the layman they seemed to reveal a human being who should not be killed. On March 20th, a CAT scan of Mrs Schiavo's brain — the grey matter of the cerebral cortex more or less gone, replaced by cerebrospinal fluid — was posted on a blog. By March 29th, it had brought 390 passionate and warring responses.
All this outside interference could only exacerbate the real, cruel dilemmas of the case. After a heart attack in February 1990, when she was 26, Mrs Schiavo's brain was deprived of oxygen for five minutes and irreparably damaged. For a while, her family hoped she might be rehabilitated. Her husband Michael bought her new clothes and wheeled her round art galleries, in case her brain could respond. By 1993, he was sure it could not, and when she caught an infection he did not want her treated. Her parents disagreed, and claimed she could recover.
From that point the family split, and litigation started. Each side, backed by legions of supporters, accused the other of money-grubbing and bad faith. A Florida court twice ordered Mrs Schiavo's feeding tube to be removed and Jeb Bush, the governor of Florida, overruled it. The final removal of the tube, on March 18th, was followed by an extraordinary scene, in the early hours of March 21st, when George Bush signed into law a bill allowing Mrs Schiavo's parents to appeal yet again to a federal court. But by then the courts, and two-thirds of Americans, thought that enough was enough. On March 24th the Supreme Court declined to hear the case.
单选题 The first paragraph implies that ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[考点解析] 推论题,文章第1段一开始就谈到Terri Schiavo小时候的一次偶然事件(Bobby accidentally locked her in a suitcase),这一情景伴随她终身,预示了她的可怕结局。所以正确答案为C。
单选题 In the sentence "More than that, it had become a box..." (Line 1, Para. 2 ) , "it" ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[考点解析] 本题为上下文词义辨析题,根据代词的指代关系就近的原则,从上下文判断,可知此处的it指代的是第1段最后一句中的主语her body(她的遗体),所以正确答案为B。
单选题 What's doctors' opinion on Mrs Schiavo's case?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[考点解析] 推论题,医生们对Schiavo病情的看法是什么呢?从第3段第3行可以做出推论。录像带显示,Schiavo面带微笑,与身边的人交流(communicating with to hose around her),但医生们却认为这只是一种假象,将其叫做“反射行为而已”(mere reflex activity),可见医生们认为,Schiavo已经没有生命,由此可推论正确答案为A。
单选题 The cruel dilemmas of Schiavo's case lies in ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[考点解析] 细节题,Schiavo案例进退两难(dilemmas)的关键何在?我们可从文章的第4段中找到答案。她父母坚持认为她能够康复(her family hoped she might be rehabilitated),但她丈夫却认为不能(Her husband was sure it could not),由此形成了意见分歧。选项D与文章的意思一致,所以D为正确答案。
单选题 From the last paragraph we may infer that on Schiavo's case ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[考点解析] 推论题,Schiavo的案例引发了众多的人士和机构的关注,包括佛罗里达州法院、州长Jeb Bush,甚至美国总统Bush;连美国老百姓也认为这太过分了(enough was enough),最后闹到美国最高法院(the Supreme Court),由此可见,最后的终审由最高法院做出,所以正确答案是答案为D。