阅读理解 If a heavy reliance on fossil fuels makes a country a climate ogre, then Denmark—with its thousands of wind turbines sprinkled on the coastlines and at sea—is living a happy fairy tale.
Viewed from the United States or Asia, Denmark is an environmental role model. The country is "what a global warming solution looks like," wrote Frances Beinecke, the president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, in a letter to the group last autumn. About one-fifth of the country's electricity comes from wind, which wind experts say is the highest proportion of any country.
But a closer look shows that Denmark is a far cry from a clean-energy paradise.
The building of wind turbines has virtually ground to a halt since subsidies were cut back. Meanwhile, compared with others in the European Union, Danes remain above-average emitters of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide. For all its wind turbines, a large proportion of the rest of Denmark's power is generated by plants that burn imported coal.
"We are losing ground," said Anne Grete Holmsgaard, the energy spokeswoman for the opposition Socialist People's Party in Denmark. "It's terrible, actually, that we're not that green as we should be."
The Danish experience shows how difficult it can be for countries grown rich on fossil fuels to switch to renewable energy sources like wind power. Among the hurdles are fluctuating political priorities, the high cost of putting new turbines offshore, concern about public acceptance of large wind turbines and the volatility of the wind itself.
But countries like Denmark are far ahead of the United States in overall use of green electricity, mostly because of government support.
"Europe has really led the way," said Alex Klein, a senior analyst with Emerging Energy Research, a consulting firm with offices in Cambridge, Massachusetts. "Very progressive policies by the Danes and Germany mean the wind industry was able to evolve and build up scale."
Some parts of western Denmark derive 100 percent of their peak needs from wind if the breeze is up. Germany and Spain generate more power in absolute terms, but in those countries wind still accounts for a far smaller proportion of the electricity generated. The average for all 27 European Union countries is 3 percent.
But the Germans and the Spanish are catching up as Denmark slows down. Of the thousands of megawatts of wind power added last year around the world, only 8 megawatts were installed in Denmark.
If higher subsidies had been maintained, Denmark could now be generating close to one-third — rather than one-fifth—of its electricity from windmills.
单选题 21.According to Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 2, we can summarize that______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】属段落主旨题。作者在文章前两段表达了对丹麦绿色能源——风能电力产业的大力肯定,故选项D符合题意。选项A在前两段并没有提及,而是在第三段之后才开始论述的,故错误;选项B无中生有,原文并没有提到丹麦政府为自己风力电力的发展情况以及占总发电量的高比例而沾沾自喜,故选项B错误。选项C只是对第二段第三句话的简单阐述,并不是总结前两段主旨而得出的结论,故选项C错误。
单选题 22.According to the text, why did she mean when Anne Grete Holmsgaard said "we are losing ground"?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】属事实细节题。选项B是丹麦绿色产业退步的一个原因,并不能解释该句话的意思,故选项B错误。选项C和选项D利用原文部分关键词汇进行无关干扰,与该句话不相关,故C项和D项错误。文章的第十段第一句话是对这句话最好的释义,而选项A恰好表达了同样的意思,故选项A符合题意。
单选题 23.On which of the fallowings would Alex Klein most probably agree?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】属信息推断题。从文章第八段亚历克斯·克雷恩的那段话我们可以看出,他对欧洲在绿色能源发展方面的领导地位持肯定态度,他谈到德国和丹麦政府会出台很多进步政策来促进该产业的发展,从中我们能推测出其隐含意思,即希望其他国家也能效仿欧洲各国政府的政策,故选项D正确。选项A和C不合文意,选项B并不能从文中推测出来,故错误。
单选题 24.According to the author, Denmark would most probably do the following actions except _____in the future.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】属信息推断题。从文章第十段可以看出,作者呼吁政府为绿色能源的发展提供更强有力的财政支持,故选项A符合文意。作者在文章中夸赞丹麦是个环保国家,所以丹麦政府一定会致力于在民众之中宣传环保思想,选项B符合文意。丹麦在风力能源的开发上处于世界前列,我们也能从文章中推测出,丹麦政府一定乐于分享发展绿色能源的经验,故选项D符合文意。作者在文章的第四段第三句中提到了丹麦的火力发电,但选项C过于绝对,让丹麦完全根除火力发电不现实,故本题应选C项。
单选题 25.The author's attitude towards wind power is one of______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】属态度推断题。虽然作者在文章第六段指出了各国风力发电产业发展的一些瓶颈,但是作者在全文还是对风力电力表示了肯定,鼓励各国开发风力这个可再生绿色能源,故本题应选B项。