单选题

You hear the refrain all the time: the U. S. economy looks good statistically, but it doesn't fed good. Why doesn't ever-greater wealth promote ever-greater happiness.'? It is a quest, ion that dales at least to the appearance in 1958 of The affluent(富裕的)Society by John Kenneth Galbraith, who died recently at 97.
The Affluent Society is a modem classic because it helped define a new moment in the human condition. For most of history," hunger, sickness, and cold" threatened nearly everyone, Galbraith wrote. "Poverty was found everywhere in that world. Obviously it is not of ours. "After World War Il, the dread of another Great Depression gave way to an economic boom. In the 1930s unemployment had averaged 18. 2 percent; in the 1950s it was 4. 5 percent.
To Galbraith, materialism had gone mad and would breed discontent. Through advertising, companies conditioned consumers to buy things they didn't really want or need. Because so much spending was artificial, it would be unfulfilling. Meanwhile, government spending that would make everyone better off was being cut down because people instinctively-and wrongly-labeled government only as "a necessary evil".
It's often said that only the rich are getting ahead; everyone else is standing still or falling behind. Well, there are many undeserving rich--overpaid chief executives, for instance. But over any meaningful period, most people's incomes are increasing. From 1995 to 2004, inflation-adjusted average family income rose 14. 3 percent, to $ 43,200. People feel, "squeezed" because their rising incomes often don't satisfy their rising wants--for bigger homes, more health care, more education, faster Internet connections.
The other great frustration is that it has not eliminated insecurity. People regard job stability as part of their standard of living. As corporate layoffs increased, that part has eroded. More workers fear they've be- come "the disposable American" ,as Louis Uchitelle puts it in his book by the same name.
Because so much previous suffering and social-conflict stemmed from poverty ,the arrival of widespread affluence suggested utopian(乌托邦式的)possibilities. Up to a point, affluence succeeds. There is much less physical misery than before. People are better off. Unfortunately, affluence also creates new complaints and contradictions.
Advanced societies need economic growth to satisfy the multiplying wants of their citizens. But the quest for growth lets loose new anxieties and economic conflicts that disturb the social order. Affluence liberates the individual ,promising that everyone can choose a unique way to self-fulfillment. But the promise is so extravagant that it predestines many disappointments and sometimes inspires choices that have anti-social consequences, including family breakdown and obesity (肥胖症). Statistical indicators of happiness have not risen with incomes.
Should we be surprised? Not really. We've simply reaffirmed an old truth: the pursuit of affluence does not always end with happiness.

单选题 What question does John Kenneth Galbraith raise in his book The Affluent Society?

单选题 According to Galbraith, people feel discontented because ______

单选题 Why do people feel squeezed when their average income rises considerably?

【正确答案】 A

【答案解析】[解析] 该题问“平均工资水平大幅提高了，为什么人们还觉得压力大”。短文第四段指出“People feel‘squeezed’because their rising incomes often don't satisfy their rising wants—for bigger homes， more health care，more education，faster Internet connections．”也就是说收入的提高并不能满足各方面日益增长的需求。故A“他们的物质需求已远远超出其收入”正确。B“他们的购买力因通货膨胀而显著下降”；C“财富分配不均”；D“医保费和教育费已失控”，短文均未提及。

单选题 What does Louis Uchitelle mean by "the disposable American" (Line 3, Para. 5) ?

【正确答案】 D

【答案解析】[解析] 该题问“Louis Uchitelle所说的‘the disposable American’是指哪些人”。短文第五段第三行提到“the disposable American”，要想猜出其意，需从本段的前几句话中寻求线索“People regard job stability as part of their standard of living．As corporate layoffs increased，that part has eroded．”也就是说作为生活水平一部分的稳定千作随着公司日益频繁的裁员而受到侵蚀。“More workers fear they've become‘the disposable American’，as Louis Uchitelle puts it in his book by the same name．”可以看出，此句话中的fear指的正是裁员这件事，而workers指的则是可能会失去工作的员工。故D“不再有稳定工作的员工”。