问答题
The Great Video Pacifier

Last spring, my husband and I loaded our three children into the car and drove off to see friends in the United States. Over the course of a week, we visited half a dozen households, each with children of its own. 1 And I found myself struck, again and again, by the frequency with which we modern parents use television to silence young children.
Get a couple of families together, and when noise from the kids rises too much, one goes the video and all is gratifying silence until the credits roll. 2 It"s like throwing a blanket over a noisy parrot"s cage: With one motion, the parrot"s stimulating surroundings vanish and its squawking instantly subsides. Hit the "play" button and the same thing happens. Children might be wrestling or running around, but let that mesmerizing box light up and they"ll stop to stare at the screen. Nearby, the adults smile as the caterwauling ceases: "Phew! That"s better."
The video has become a member of every family I know. Need to finish a project on a Sunday afternoon? Popping a video buys you an hour or two. Often my children go to play in someone"s basement room and a video is on from the time they arrive until they leave.
Guilty as I am myself. I find promiscuous use of this sedative disquieting.
Children don"t stand a chance against videos. 3 No matter how imaginative or independent they may be or how much they may like playing with visiting friends, they cannot escape the stupefying effects of the box.
4 Child-development expert Paul Smith attributes this to the brain"s "orienting response", a reaction discovered by Parlor early in the last century. "We humans are programmed to look at abrupt changes in our Visual field." she writes, "It"s part of our survival mechanism. The colorful, quick images on TV are difficult to resist."
5 Years ago, I read in a newspaper about a study that found if people can choose between watching a lecturer behind a podium and a video projection of that same lecturer, they"ll gaze at the screen . The TV trumps real life every time.
【正确答案】
【答案解析】我一次次吃惊地发现,我们这些当代的父母们居然经常用电视来让孩子们安静下来。[解析] 要注意again and again的限制对象不是后面的by the frequency,而是前面的found。另外,the frequency在英文里是名词短语,译成汉语时要处理成副词“经常”。silence在此句中是动词,意为“使……安静”。
【正确答案】
【答案解析】这就好比是向一只吵吵嚷嚷的鹦鹉所在的笼子上扔块毯子,只一个动作,促使鹦鹉吵嚷的环境就立马消失了,它也立刻不吵了。[解析] 本句要注意vanish的翻译,不能简单译成“消失”完事,要注意它是“迅速消失,突然消失”的意思,这也与后面的instantly形成呼应。subside意为“平息,衰减”。
【正确答案】
【答案解析】无论他们多么富于想象力,多么独立,也无论他们多么想和前来找他们的伙伴们玩耍,他们都无法逃脱这个让人痴迷的盒子的影响。[解析] 本句中关键要注意对stupefying的翻译,其原意是“让人麻木的,让人麻醉的,枯燥乏味的”,但这里显然不是这个意思,而是“让人痴迷的,让人着魔的”的意思,这从下一段就原因进行的解释中可以得到印证。
【正确答案】
【答案解析】儿童发展专家保罗·史密斯将其归因于人类大脑的“定向反应”。大脑的这种反应是由帕勒于上世纪早期发现的。[解析] 本句中,attribute...to sth.意为“把……归因于”;the brain并不是指哪个特定的人的大脑,这里的定冠词是类指,因此,要译成“人类大脑”;而early in the last century要译成“上世纪早期”。
【正确答案】
【答案解析】多年以前,我在报纸上读过一篇文章,文章说,有研究发现,如果让人们选择是愿意看站在讲台后面的演讲人还是愿意看出现在屏幕上的该演讲人,他们会选择盯着屏幕看。[解析] years ago要译成“多年以前”,因为英语用复数形式来表示“多”的概念,而汉语所谓的“复数形式”一说,只能选择意译。另外,原文newspaper about a study要拆开来译,更符合汉语的习惯。其他的如they"ll gaze...译的时候要在“盯”字前面加上“选择”,这也是汉语习惯的要求。