多选题
The {{U}}
common{{/U}} belief of some linguists that
{{U}}each language is a perfect vehicle{{/U}} for the thoughts of the nation
speaking it is in some ways the exact counterpart of the conviction of the
Manchester school of economics that supply and demand will regulate everything
for the best. Just as economists were blind to the numerous cases in which the
law of supply and demand left actual wants unsatisfied, so also many linguists
are deaf to those instances in which the very nature of a language calls forth
misunderstandings in everyday conversation, and in which, consequently, a word
has to be modified or defined in order to present the idea intended by the
speaker: "He took his stick—no, not John's, but his own." {{U}}No language is
perfect{{/U}}, and if we admit this truth, we must also admit that it is not
unreasonable to investigate the relative merits of different languages or of
different details in languages.
The primary purpose of the
passage is to
- A. analyze an interesting feature of the English language.
- B. refute a belief held by some linguists.
- C. show that economic theory is relevant to linguistic study.
- D. illustrate the confusion that can result from the improper use of
language.
- E. suggest a way in which languages can be made more nearly
perfect.