多选题 The {{U}}common{{/U}} belief of some linguists that {{U}}each language is a perfect vehicle{{/U}} for the thoughts of the nation speaking it is in some ways the exact counterpart of the conviction of the Manchester school of economics that supply and demand will regulate everything for the best. Just as economists were blind to the numerous cases in which the law of supply and demand left actual wants unsatisfied, so also many linguists are deaf to those instances in which the very nature of a language calls forth misunderstandings in everyday conversation, and in which, consequently, a word has to be modified or defined in order to present the idea intended by the speaker: "He took his stick—no, not John's, but his own." {{U}}No language is perfect{{/U}}, and if we admit this truth, we must also admit that it is not unreasonable to investigate the relative merits of different languages or of different details in languages.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
  • A. analyze an interesting feature of the English language.
  • B. refute a belief held by some linguists.
  • C. show that economic theory is relevant to linguistic study.
  • D. illustrate the confusion that can result from the improper use of language.
  • E. suggest a way in which languages can be made more nearly perfect.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 通过文章首句的common,我们可以确定本文属于新老观点对比型文章。文章首句指出:语言学家认为语言是完美的工具;后文划线部分(No language is perfect)又指出:没有一种语言是完美的,对文章开头的观点进行驳斥。因此正确选项应为B选项“驳斥一个观点”。