单选题
Passage Four

Over the past century, all kinds of unfairness and discrimination have been condemned or made illegal. But one insidious form continues to thrive: alphabetism. This, for those as yet unaware of such a disadvantage, refers to discrimination against those whose surnames begin with a letter in the lower half of the alphabet.
It has long been known that a taxi firm called AAAA cars has a big advantage over Zodiac cars when customers thumb through their phone directories. Less well known is the advantage that Adam Abbott has in life over Zoe Zysman. English names are fairly evenly spread between the halves of the alphabet. Yet a suspiciously large number of top people have surnames beginning with letters between A and K.
Thus the American president and vice-president have surnames starting with B and C respectively; and 26 of George Bush's predecessors (including his father) had surnames in the first half of the alphabet against just 16 in the second half. Even more striking, six of the seven heads of government of the G7 rich countries are alphabetically advantaged (Berlusconi, Blair, Bush, Chirac, Chretien and Koizumi). The world's three top central bankers (Greenspan, Duisenberg and Hayami) are all close to the top of the alphabet, even if one of them really uses Japanese characters. As are the world's five richest men (Gates, Buffett, Allen, Ellison and Albrecht).
Can this merely be coincidence? One theory, dreamt up in all the spare time enjoyed by the alphabetically disadvantaged, is that the rot sets in early. At the start of the first year in infant school, teachers seat pupils alphabetically from the front, to make it easier to remember their names. So short-sighted Zysman junior gets stuck in the back row, and is rarely asked the improving questions posed by those insensitive teachers. At the time the alphabetically disadvantaged may think they have had a lucky escape. Yet the result may be worse qualifications, because they get less individual attention, as well as less confidence in speaking publicly.
The humiliation continues. At university graduation ceremonies, the ABCs proudly get their awards first; by the time they reach the Zysmans most people are literally having a ZZZ. Shortlists for job interviews, election ballot papers, lists of conference speakers and attendees: all tend to be drawn up alphabetically, and their recipients lose interest as they plough through them.

单选题 What does the author intend to illustrate with AAAA cars and Zodiac cars?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】这是一道结构题。题干中的信号词为AAAA cars和Zodiac,出自于文章第二段第一句话中。文章第一段指出:一种隐秘的不公平和歧视继续盛行,也就是以字母的先后排顺序。第二段指出:人们早就知道,当乘客通过电话本叫出租车时,一家名为“4A汽车”的出租车公司所具有的优势就比一家名为Zodiac的汽车公司大;人们不太知晓的是这样的有利条件——在生活中,Adam Abbott比Zoe Zysman有优势。这说明,作者利用AAAA cars和Zodiac汽车公司是为了举例说明——人们忽视了一种隐秘的不公平和歧视。A说“一种被人们忽视的不平等”,这与作者的目的符合。B和D不是作者的目的。文中没有说明隐秘的不公平和歧视是个人偏见,所以C不是作者的目的。
单选题 What can we infer from the first three paragraphs?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】这是一道推论题。题干中的信号词为the first three paragraphs,也就是文章的前面三段。文章前面三段指出:过去,各种各样的不公平和歧视受到人们的谴责或是被视为违法;但是,一种隐秘的不公平和歧视继续盛行;人们早就知道,当乘客通过电话本叫出租车时,名为“4A汽车”的出租车公司所具有的优势就比名为Zodiac的汽车公司大;人们不太知晓的是——在生活中,Adam Abbott比Zoe Zysman有优势。然后举例指出:有些人有字母方面的优势。这说明,由于某些隐秘的不公平和歧视太细微,难以被人们关注。D说“某种歧视太细微因而难以辨别”, 这与文章的意思相符。文中没有提到A和C;文中并没有提到“人们指责字母表导致姓氏靠后者的失败”,所以B不对。
单选题 The 4th paragraph suggests that ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】这是一道推论题。题干中的信号词为the 4th paragraph,也就是文章的第四段。文章第四段指出:一种理论认为,这种情况早就存在;在幼儿园的起始阶段,老师根据字母顺序从前到后给学生排座位,一些姓氏靠后的幼儿不得不坐在后排,那些不敏感的老师很少向这些幼儿提一些有启发性的问题;而那些不具备字母优势的人可能认为他们有幸逃脱了,结果可能会造成更严重的后果。由此可知,老师不应该忽视那些没有字母优势的学生。C说“老师应该关注所有学生”,这与文章的意思相符。文中提到questions时并没有说经常提问更聪明的幼儿,所以A不对;文中提到alphabetically disadvantaged时并不是说他们经常逃课,所以B不对;文中没有提到D。
单选题 What does the author mean by "most people are literally having a ZZZ" (Paragraph 5) ?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】这是一道词义题。题干中的信号词出自于文章第五段第二句话中。文章第五段指出:在大学的毕业典礼上,那些姓氏靠前者首先获得奖品;等到该姓氏靠后者获奖时,大多数人差不多都在打瞌睡了。ZZZ意为“打鼾声”。这说明,该句话的意思应该是“大多数人差不多都睡着了”。B说“他们正在打鼾”,这与文章的意思相符。A不准确;C和D明显与文章的意思不符。
单选题 Which of the following is TRUE according to the passage?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】这是一道细节题。文章第一段指出:各种各样的不公平和歧视受到人们的谴责或是被视为违法;但是,有一种隐秘的不公平和歧视继续盛行,这就是按字母排序。第二段指出:人们早就知道,当乘客通过电话本叫出租车时,名为“4A汽车”的出租车公司所具有的优势就比名为Zodiac的汽车公司大;但是,人们不太知晓的是——在生活中,Adam Abbott比Zoe Zysman有优势。第三段举例进一步说明。第四段指出:这只能算是巧合吗?在幼儿园,老师根据字母顺序从前到后给学生排座位,结果可能会造成更严重的后果。这说明,根据字母的先后排序的做法可能导致偏见。D说“以字母先后排顺序的做法可能导致无意识的偏见”,这与文章的意思相符。文中是说姓氏靠字母表后部分的人可能受到人们的歧视,并没有说会受到虐待,所以A不对。文中只是说“更令人惊奇的是,七个富裕国家的政府首脑中,有六位具有按字母排序的优势;世界上最重要的三位金融人士的姓氏都靠近字母表的前部分;世界上最富裕的五个人也是这样”,并没有说他们从以字母先后排序的做法中获得极大的好处,所以B不对。文中只是说“这种使人蒙羞的情况还在继续”,并没有说消除以字母先后排序的运动仍然任重道远,所以C也不对。