Dieting, according to an old joke, may not actually make you live longer, but it sure feels that way. Nevertheless, evidence has been accumulating since the 1930s that calorie restriction—reducing an animal"s energy intake below its energy expenditure—extends lifespan and delays the onset of age-related diseases in rats, dogs, fish and monkeys. Such results have inspired thousands of people toput up with constant hunger in the hope of living longer, healthier lives. They have also led to a search for drugs that mimic the effects of calorie restriction without the pain of going on an actual diet. Amid the hype (intensive publicity), it is easy to forget that no one has until now shown that calorie restriction works in humans. That omission, however, changed this month, with the publication of the initial results of the first systematic investigation into the matter. This study, known as CALERIE (Comprehensive Assessment of Long-term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy), was sponsored by America"s National Institutes of Health. It took 48 men and women aged between 25 and 50 and assigned them randomly to either a control group or a calorie-restriction regime. Those in the second group were requir ed to cut their calorie intake for six months to 75% of that needed to maintain their weight. The CALERIE study is a landmark in the history of the field, because its subjects were either of normal weight or only slightly overweight. Previous projects have used individuals who were clinically obese, thus confusing the unquestionable benefits to health of reducing obesity with the possible advantages of calorie restriction to the otherwise healthy. At a molecular level, CALERIE suggests these advantages are real. For example, those on restricted diets had lower insulin resistance and lower levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. They showed drops in body temperature and blood-insulin levels—both phenomena that have been seen in long-lived, calorie-restricted animals. They also suffered less oxidative damage to their DNA. Eric Ravussin, of Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge, who is one of the study"s authors, says that such results provide support for the theory that calorie restriction produces a metabolic adaptation over and above that which would be expected from weight loss alone. Nevertheless, such metabolic adaptation could be the reason why calorie restriction is associated with longer lifespans in other animals—and that is certainly the hope of those who, for the past 15 years, have been searching for ways of triggering that metabolic adaptation by means other than semi-starvation.
单选题 The evidence since the 1930s has inspired people to _____.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:推理判断题。根据1930s定位文章第一段,其中提到人们忍受饥饿,以期换得长寿和健康。而挨饿的本质即是减少卡路里摄入量,因此选C项。
单选题 Which of the following is true about the CALERIE study?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:事实细节题,考查是非细节。文章第二段提到之前无人证明限制卡路里摄人量对人类同样有效,而CALERIE填补了之前的研究空白,意即此项研究证明了限制卡路里摄人量对人类有效,A项符合文意。
单选题 What makes the CALERIE study a significant one in the field?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:事实细节题,考查例证细节。第三段首句指出,CALERIE研究之所以是一座里程碑是因为选取的研究个体为体重正常或轻微偏重的个体,B项符合。
单选题 By saying "CALERIE suggests these advantages are real (Para. 4)", the author is dealing with the results of the study from a _____.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:语义理解题。本题实质上考查的是引述内容前面的At a molecular level这一说法的含义。molecular意为“分子的”,因此这句话是从微观的角度阐述的,故选D项。
单选题 It can be inferred from the last paragraph that _____.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:判断推理题,考查是非细节。文章最后一段提到一些人寻找能够引发新陈代谢调节能力的新方法,而不仅仅是通过节食导致的半饥饿状态来引发;可见节食可以引发新陈代谢调节能力,因此选B项。