问答题
Should Existing Nuclear Weapons Be Abolished?

You are to write in three parts.
In the first part, state specifically what your opinion is.
In the second part, provide one or two reasons to support your opinion.
In the last part, bring what you have written to a natural conclusion or make a summary.
Marks will be awarded for content, organization, language and appropriateness. Failure to follow, the instructions may result in a loss of marks.

【正确答案】
Should Nuclear Weapons Be Abolished?

Now a few countries intend to develop their own nuclear weapons, thinking that if they do have such destructive equipments, no other country would nuke them. Other countries appeal to banning the development of nuclear weapons, thinking it would endanger the safety 0f the whole world. For my own part, nuclear weapons should be abolished. My idea is grounded in the following two points.
One point is that the result of having nuclear weapons cannot be good in any situation. Nuclear weapons are too destructive, not only to human beings, but to the entire planet. No country will actually use a nuclear weapon because they all know what the outcome will be: everyone and everything will be destroyed. The cases of Hiroshima and Nagasaki should be enough to make us think how destructive nuclear weapons can be.
The other point is that nuclear weapons are no longer the threat that they used to be at the time of their inception—nearly every country in the world either possesses a nuclear weapon or is the close ally of a nation that does. Nuclear weapons currently pose more of a threat as a tool of disaster by accident than by war.
To conclude,nuclear weapons have been shown too destructive and not to be effective as a deterrent. They should be abolished so that countries can work towards solving their conflicts and accomplish peace.
【答案解析】