阅读理解   When it comes to health, which is more important, nature or nurture? You may well think your genes are a more important predictor of health and ill health. Not so fast. In fact, it transpires that our everyday environment outweighs our genetics, big time, when it comes to measuring our risk of disease. The genome is out—welcome the exposome.
    'The exposome represents everything a person is exposed to in the environment, that's not in the genes,' says Stephen Rappaport, environmental health scientist at the University of California, Berkeley. That includes stress, diet, lifestyle choices, recreational and medicinal drug use and infections, to name a few. 'The big difference is that the exposome changes throughout life as our bodies, diets and lifestyles change,' he says.
    While our understanding of the human genome has been growing at an exponential rate over the last decade, it is not as helpful as we hoped in predicting diseases. 'Genes only contribute 10 percent to the overall disease burden,' says Rappaport.
    'Knowing genetic risk factors can prove absolutely futile ,' says Jeremy Nicholson at Imperial College London. He points to work by Nina Paynter at the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, who investigated the effect of 101 genetic markers implicated in heart disease. After following over 19,000 women for 12 years, she found these markers were not able to predict anything about the incidence of heart disease in this group.
    On the other hand, the impact of environmental influences is still largely a mystery.' There's an imbalance between our ability to investigate the genome and the environment,' says Chris Wild, director of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, who came up with the idea of the exposome.
    In reality, most diseases are probably caused by a combination of the two, which is where the exposome comes in. 'The idea is to have a comprehensive analysis of a person's full exposure history,' says Wild. He hopes a better understanding of exposures will shed a brighter light on disease risk factors.
    There are likely to be critical periods of exposure in development. For example, the time from birth to 3 years of age is thought to be particularly important. 'We know that this is the time when brain connections are made, and that if you are obese by this age, you'll have problems as an adult,' says Nicholson.
单选题     Rappaport argues that a major threat to our human health ______.
 
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】 细节定位题。根据题干定位到文章第一段。本段提到人们考虑影响健康的因素往往想到基因问题,但这个科学家却认为人们所处环境更重要,并且应该是首要考虑的因素。所以答案为A。
单选题     What can be said of the exposome according to Rappaport?
 
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】 细节理解题。根据题干关键词定位到文章第二段。本段最后一句是解题的原文信息:环境暴露的变化就如同饮食和生活方式一样,其变化贯穿一生。因而答案为D。
单选题     Speaking of genes, Rappaport would say that ______.
 
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】 概括题。根据科学家的名字可以定位到第二段与第三段。Rappaport在这两段提到环境对人类健康、疾病的重大影响,而且虽然我们对人类基因研究投入太多,但基因对疾病的影响却很少。因而可以推断出这位科学家并没有完全否定基因的作用,但环境的影响却大得多。所以答案为D。
单选题     Even though we cannot pinpoint the exact impact of environmental influence, Wild contends that ______.
 
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】 推理题。根据题干定位到第五段。与解题相关的信息是在第六段。Wild认为患病或许是基因和环境因素综合的结果,应该对个体整个生存历史环境状况进行分析。因而答案为C。
单选题     Particularly important, according to Nicholson, is the time when ______.
 
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】 推理题。根据题干人名定位到文章最后一句。从出生到三岁这一阶段很重要。这位科学家也认为如果在这一阶段就胖,成年后有可能有肥胖问题。从此可以推断出现环境暴露因素出现的时间点是综合考虑患病因素的重要阶段。