阅读理解 Economists often like to speak of Homo economicus—rational economic man. In practice, human economic behaviour is not quite as rational as the relentless logic of theoretical economics suggests it ought to be. When buying things in a straight exchange of money for goods, people often respond to changes in price in exactly the way that theoretical economics predicts. But when faced with an exchange whose outcome is predictable only on average, most people prefer to avoid the risk of making a loss than to take the chance of making a gain in circumstances when the average expected outcome of the two actions would be the same.
There has been a lot of discussion about this discrepancy in the economic literature—in particular, about whether it is the product of cultural experience or is a reflection of a deeper biological phenomenon. So Keith Chen, of the Yale School of Management, and his colleagues decided to investigate its evolutionary past. They reasoned that if they could find similar behavior in another species of primate(none of which has yet invented a cash economy)this would suggest that loss-aversion evolved in a common ancestor. They chose the capuchin monkey, Cebus apella, a South American species often used for behavioral experiments.
First, the researchers had to introduce their monkeys to the idea of a cash economy. They did this by giving them small metal discs while showing them food. The monkeys quickly learned that humans valued these inedible discs so much that they were willing to trade them for scrumptious pieces of apple, grapes and jelly. Preliminary experiments established the amount of apple that was valued as much as either a grape or a cube of jelly, and set the price accordingly, at one disc per food item. The monkeys were then given 12 discs and allowed to trade them one at a time for whichever foodstuff they preferred.
Once the price had been established, though, it was changed. The size of the apple portions was doubled, effectively halving the price of apple. At the same time, the number of discs a monkey was given to spend fell from 12 to nine. The result was that apple consumption went up in exactly the way that price theory(as applied to humans)would predict. Indeed, averaged over the course of ten sessions it was within 1% of the theory's prediction. One up to Cebus economicus.
The experimenters then began to test their animals' risk aversion. They did this by offering them three different trading regimes in succession. Each required choosing between the wares of two experimental "salesmen". In the first regime one salesman offered one piece of apple for a disc, while the other offered two. However, half the time the second salesman only handed over one piece. Despite this deception, the monkeys quickly worked out that the second salesman offered the better overall deal, and came to prefer him.
单选题 11.The capuchin monkey was chosen for the experiments because______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】属细节题。根据题干定位到原文第二段末句。科学家们首先选与人类行为相似的灵长类,然后具体到经常用来做行为实验的capuchin monkey。所以答案是C。A、B是事实,但不是原因。D在文章中没提到。
单选题 12.How were the monkeys introduced to the idea of a cash economy?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】属细节题。根据题干中the idea of a cash economy回到原文第三段第二句。“did this”指的就是introduce their monkeys to the idea of a cash economy,他们给猴子们一些小金属圆片,同时向它们展示食物。通过这种办法给猴子的大脑里引入现金交易的概念,所以D为正确答案。A中的told没有事实依据。B项说如果猴子给研究人员食物,就能得到金属圆片,这明显不对,应该是猴子们用金属圆片买研究人员手里的食物。文章中没有明确表明三种不同食物的不同价格,所以排除C。
单选题 13.The researchers reduce the "cost" of apples in order to______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】属推断题。倒数第二段第二句指出,苹果的份额增加了一倍,因此价格就降了一倍。结果苹果的销售量像人类价格理论预测的那样上升了。结合第一、二段,试验的目的就是为了弄清猴子会不会像人一样,当价格下降后就去买更多的商品。所以A为正确答案。其他都不是最终目的。
单选题 14.The first trading regime mentioned in the final paragraph revealed that______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】属细节题。从文中最后一句可知答案。A项是不是介意被骗文章没提到,文章只是说尽管被骗,猴子们还是去买。B没有涉及。C虽为事实,但答非所问。
单选题 15.What is the next paragraph likely to cover?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】属推断题。文章末段第二句提到要连续进行三种trading regimes的试验,然后只讲了第一种,当然接下来要讲第二种了,所以B为正确答案。其他选项均无依据。