单选题 Congress can pass laws, regulators can beef up enforcement, and shareholders can demand more accountability. But when it comes right down to it, making sure a company is operating well is really an inside job. That"s where internal auditing comes in. It doesn"t sound glamorous, but it"s an expanding field beckoning to people with a lot of pent up we-can-do-better energy. Internal auditors keep an eye on a company"s "controls"—not just financial systems, but all sorts of functions designed to make the business run smoothly and protect the interests of shareholders.
The recent string of corporate scandals provided a rude awakening to the importance of these internal checks. In the case of WorldCom, it was internal auditor Cynthia Cooper who blew the whistle on the company for inflating profits by $3.8 billion. She didn"t intend to be a hero, she said to Time magazine when it named her one of its Persons of the Year. She was just doing her job.
A lot more of those jobs are opening up as companies turn to internal auditors for help in complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Top executives of publicly held companies now have to sign off on their financial statements and vouch for the effectiveness of internal controls. "Up until now, CEOs and CFOs have been going to bed and sleeping well at night, knowing that they"ve got good controls or financial reporting because they"ve got good people ... But what"s missing is the documentation that really supports that gut feel," says Trent Gazzaway, the national director of corporate governance advisory services for Grant Thornton, an accounting and business consultancy firm. "I cannot think of a time in history when there"s been a greater opportunity to enter the internal-audit field," he adds.
Job postings on the website of the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) in Altamonte Springs, Fla., have more than doubled in the past year, says IIA president William Bishop III. And in the organization"s survey for 2002, half the internal-audit directors said they planned to make one or more new hires that year. People who can assess computerized systems are especially in demand.
Privately held companies are voluntarily adding more scrutiny, as well. In a recent survey that drew responses from 1,400 CFOs in such businesses, 58 percent said they are responding to new corporate-governance standards. Of those, 36 percent are creating or expanding internal auditing, according to Robert Half Management Resources. An American company with $3 billion to $4 billion in revenue typically has about 16 internal auditors. The job is often a training ground for future management positions, but those who stay in the field and become directors earn an average of just under $100,000. The IIA offers certification for internal auditors, but many firms do not require it.
Assessing "the tone at the top"—the culture and the ethical environment of a company—is one of the key charges for internal auditors, Mr. Bishop says. But their effectiveness depends on the resources and independence senior managers give them. As auditors have a perspective that encompasses every aspect of the company, executives sometimes want to hear their recommendations for improving systems. But their main goal is to make sure the systems already in place are working properly.
The balancing act can be tricky. "If I make a recommendation ... and then I come and evaluate it, I"m not going to be criticizing it," says Parveen Gupta, who teaches corporate governance and accounting at Lehigh University. Ideally, the internal auditor should be an extra set of eyes, a consultant who knows the company well but has enough independence to give honest feedback. Regulations "are pushing internal auditors to become a bit more policeman-oriented," he says, "but if employees perceive it as someone second-guessing them, that is very dangerous."
One tool designed to avoid that adversarial feeling is "control self-assessment". The auditor sets up discussions among employees to find out, for instance, if a written ethics policy is being implemented, or if workers are feeling such intense pressures that they might be prompted to push ethical boundaries. The power of the new laws can go only so far. "This entire issue of corporate governance—trying to run the company as if you were managing your own money—is a matter of heart and soul," Dr. Gupta says. And guts. Anyone considering a career in internal auditing, he says, "should have the guts to speak out, to tell the truth."
单选题 According to the passage, the main goal of internal auditing is ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 对文章基本内容的理解,主要见第一段。作者开篇即提出一家企业能否operating well是一个inside job,而internal auditing就是inside job的一个重要方面。选项A的解释不确切,选项B的概括不全面,选项D的总结过于宽泛,均应排除。
单选题 When Parveen Gupta says, "If I make a recommendation ... and then I come and evaluate it, I"m not going to be criticizing it," (para. 7) he implies that ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 根据上下文正确理解句子的能力,主要内容见第七段。Parveen Gupta说此话意在揭示internal auditor应保持独立、客观、公正,选项A的说明不准确,选项B的解释偏离主要意思,选项C的解释也不到位,均应排除。选项D较准确地揭示了其意,为正确答案。
单选题 The expression "to push ethical boundaries" in the sentence "or if workers are feeling such intense pressures that they might be prompted to push ethical boundaries" (para. 8) can be paraphrased as ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 根据上下文正确理解句子和词语的能力,主要见第八段。To push ethical boundaries是一带比喻意义的表达,选项C解释贴切,为正确答案。选项A与原意相反,选项B和D的解释不妥当,均应排除。
单选题 Which of the following is NOT true according to the passage?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 对文章基本内容的理解,可采用排除法。选项A的内容见第三段首句,选项B在第四段有明确说明,选项C总结了第五段的内容,均与文章提供的信息相符,应排除。选项D的内容文章中并未明确提出,为正确答案。
单选题 Which of the following best expresses the main idea of the passage?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 对文章主旨大意的归纳。选项B较准确地总结了文章的主要意思。选项A的说法不够准确,选项C的解释过于宽泛,选项D的意思虽然可以成立,但不是本文的主题,应排除。