单选题 {{B}}Passage Two{{/B}}
In a sense, the new protectionism is not protectionism at all, at least not in the traditional sense of the term. The old protectionism referred only to trade restricting and trade expanding devices, such as the tariff or export subsidy. The new protectionism is much broader than this: it includes interventions into foreign trade but is not limited to them. The new protectionism, in fact, refers to how the whole of government intervention into the private economy affects international trade. The emphasis on trade is still there, thus came the term "protection". But what is new is the realization that virtually all government activities can affect international economic relations. The emergence of the new protectionism in the Western world reflects the victory of the interventionist, or welfare economy over the market economy. Jab Tumiler writes, "The old protectionism…coexisted, without any apparent intellectual difficulty with the acceptance of the market as a national as well as an international economic distribution mechanism—indeed, protectionists as well as (if not more than) free traders stood for laissez faire (放任政策). Now, as in the 1930s, protectionism is an expression of a profound skepticism as to the ability of the market to distribute resources and incomes to societies' satisfaction."
It is precisely this profound skepticism of the market economy that is responsible for the protectionism. In a market economy, economic change of various color simplies redistribution of resources and incomes. The same opinion in many communities apparently is that such redistributions often are not proper. Therefore, the government intervenes to bring about a more desired result.
The victory of the welfare state is almost complete in northern Europe. In Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, and the Netherlands, government intervention in almost all aspects of economic and social life is considered normal. In Great Britain this is only somewhat less true. Government traditionally has played a very active role in economic life in France and continued to do so. Only West Germany dares to go against the tide towards excessive interventionism in Western Europe. It also happens to be the most successful Western European economy.
The welfare state has made significant progress in the United States as well as in Western Europe. Social security, unemployment insurance, minimum wage laws, and rent control are by now traditional welfare state elements on the America scene.
单选题 This passage is primarily concerned with discussing______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】
单选题 What is the real cause of the new protectionism?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 细节理解题。从文章第一段最后一句“……深深怀疑市场分配资源和满足社会需要的能力”和第二段第一句“正是这种怀疑……导致了这种(新)保护主义的产生”。故选C项。
单选题 What does the phrase "stood for (Para.1)" mean?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 指代题。此句“…protectionists as well as (if not more than) free traders stood for laissez faire”指“……保护主义者就像自由贸易主义者那样stood for放任政策”。前文已说明自由贸易主义者是支持由自由市场分配资源的,从as well as和if not more than可以判断stood for表示“支持”。故选B项。
单选题 Which of the following statements is NOT a characteristic of a welfare state mentioned in this passage?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 细节题。文章最后一句中包含B,C和D项的出处,没有提到A项内容。故选A项。
单选题 Which of the following inferences is TRUE, according to this passage?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 判断题。西德不是福利国家,却是西欧经济最强国,因此A项可排除;文章提到19世纪30年代时已经出现protectionism,但未指出就是这个时期出现的,无法验证其确切的出现时期,B项无法确定;从19世纪30年代就出现的protectionism不能说是最新的,文章也未说明是否是因为最新出现而起的名,C项无根据;从倒数第二段第一句“北欧几乎全是福利国家”及该段第三句“在英国,福利国家政策有点不完全”可判断D项正确。故选D项。
单选题 The passage supplies information for answering which of the following questions.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 判断题。文章第二段提供了为什么政府干预经济生活的理由。“Therefore,the government intervenes to bring about a more desired result”意思是“政府干预经济生活能带来更好的结果”。因此D项的问题文章进行了回答,而其余三项文中没有明确说明。故选D项。