单选题
What is the role of human resources as the world
goes through turmoil, and what is its future as so many industries face extreme
change?
Effendi Ibnoe, Bali, Indonesia
Talk about timing. Your question arrived in our in-box the same day that
we received a note from an acquaintance who had just been let go from his job in
publishing, certainly one of the industries that is facing, as you put it,
"extreme change". He described his layoff as a practically Orwellian experience
in which he was ushered into a conference room to meet with an outplacement
consultant who, after dispensing with logistics, informed him that she would
call him at home that evening to make sure everything was all right.
"I assured her I had friends and loved ones and a dog," he wrote, "and
since my relationship with her could be measured in terms of seconds, they could
take care of that end of things." "Memo to HR: Instead of saddling dismissed
employees with solicitous outplacement reps," he noted wryly, "put them in a
room with some crockery for a few therapeutic minutes of smashing things against
a wall." While we enjoy our friend's sense of humor, we'd
suggest a different memo to HR. "Layoffs are your moment of truth," it would
say, "when your company must show departing employees the same kind of
attentiveness and dignity that was showered upon them when they entered. Layoffs
are when HR proves its mettle and its worth, demonstrating whether a company
really cares about its people." Look, we've written before
about HR and the game-changing role we believe it can—and should—play as the
engine of an organization's hiring, appraisal, and development processes. We've
asserted that too many companies relegate HR to the mundane busy-work of
newsletters, picnics, and benefits, and we've made the case that every CEO
should elevate his head of HR to the same stature as the CFO. But if there was
ever a time to underscore the importance of HR, it has arrived. And, sadly, if
there was ever a time to see how few companies get HR right, it has arrived,
too, as our acquaintance's experience shows. So, to your
question: What is HR's correct role now—especially in terms of
layoffs? First, HR has to make sure people are let go by their
managers, not strangers. Being fired is dehumanizing in any event, but to get
the news from a "hired gun" only makes matters worse. That's why HR must ensure
that managers accept their duty, which is to be in on the one conversation at
work that must be personal. Pink slips should be delivered face-to-face,
eyeball-to-eyeball. Second, HR's role is to serve as the
company's arbiter of equity. Nothing raises hackles more during a layoff than
the sense that some people—namely the loudmouths and the litigious—are getting
better deals than others. HR can mitigate that dynamic by making sure across
units and divisions that severance arrangements, if they exist, are appropriate
and evenhanded. You simply don't want people to leave feeling as if they got
you-know-what. They need to walk out saying: "At least I know I was treated
fairly." Finally, HR's role is to absorb pain. In the hours and
days after being let go, people need to vent, and it is HR's job to be
completely available to console. At some point, an outplacement consultant can
come into the mix to assist with a transition, but HR can never let "the
departed" feel as if they've been sent to a leper colony. Someone connected to
each let-go employee—either a colleague or HR staffer—should check in regularly.
And not just to ask, "Is everything O.K.?" but to listen to the answer with an
open heart, and when appropriate, offer to serve as a reference to prospective
employers. Three years ago, we wrote a column called, "So Many
CEOs Get This Wrong", and while many letters supported our stance that too many
companies undervalue HR, a significant minority pooh-poohed HR as irrelevant to
the "real work" of business. Given the state of things, we wonder how those same
HR-minimalists feel now. If their company is in crisis—or their own
career—perhaps at last they've seen the light. HR matters enormously in good
times. It defines you in the bad.
单选题
Why does the author say that his friend's note displayed a "sense of
humor" (para. 3)?
A. Because his layoff experience showed vividly the process of "extreme
change".
B. Because he gave a vivid description of the outplacement reps' work
style.
C. Because he suggested to HR how dismissed employees should be treated
while he himself was fired.
D. Because he was optimistic with the support and understanding from his
friends and loved family members after being dismissed.
单选题
Which of the following does NOT support the author's statement that
"HR has to make sure people are let go by their managers, not strangers" (para.
6)?
A. In that case the let-go employee would feel less dehumanized.
B. By doing so the managers treat the employees with respect.
C. HR has thus played the positive role in terms of layoffs.
D. In doing so strangers will only play the role of a "hired gun".
单选题
The expression "pink slips" in the sentence "Pink slips should be
delivered face-to-face, eyeball-to-eyeball" (para. 6) can best be paraphrased as
______.
A. a letter of invitation
B. a notice of dismissal
C. a card of condolences
D. a message of greetings
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】[解析] 根据上下文正确理解句子和短语的能力。本文主题即探讨员工被解雇时应得到怎样的对待这一问题,文中多次使用相应词语。本段中就有另两个短语are let go by和being fired指向解雇事宜,pink slip即解雇通知书,此义可从上下文作出推断,选项B正确。选项A,C和D与该话题并无关联,予以排除。
单选题
Which of the following expresses the main idea of the passage?
A. The time to underscore the importance of HR has arrived.
B. Severance arrangements should be the focus of HR's job.
C. Employees should be treated with equal respect whether hired or
fired.
D. Managers must leave their duty to HR when employees are
dismissed.