Familiar as it may seem, gravity remains a mystery to modern physics. Despite several decades of trying, scientists have failed to fit Einstein"s general theory of relativity, which describes how gravity holds big objects together, with the quantum mechanics (an extension of statistical mechanics based on quantum theory) he pioneered, which describes the tiny fundamental particles of whichmatter consists and the forces by which they interact.Recent discoveries have highlighted further problems. Many physicists are therefore entertaining the idea that Einstein"s ideas about gravity must be wrong or at least incomplete. Showing exactly how and where the great man erred is the task of the scientists who gathered at the "Rethinking Gravity" conference at the University of Arizona in Tucson this week. One way to test general relativity is to examine ever more closely the assumptions on which it rests, such as the equivalence principle: that gravity accelerates all objects at the same rate, regardless of their mass or composition. This principle was famously demonstrated by Galileo Galilei some 400 years ago when he simultaneously dropped cannon and musket balls, and balls made of gold, silver and wood, from the Tower of Pisa. Each appeared to hit the ground at the same time. A more precise test requires a taller tower. In effect, researchers are sending balls all the way to the moon and back. Tom Murphy, of the University of California, San Diego, and his colleagues fire laser beams from the deserts of New Mexico at reflectors placed on the moon by American and Russian spacecraft in the late 1960s and early 1970s. They use a telescope to capture the small fraction of the light that returns. Because the speed of light is known, they can calculate the distance between the Earth and the moon from the time taken for light to pass through it. According to general relativity, because the Earth and the moon orbit the sun, they should "fall" towards it at the same rate, in the same way as Galileo"s balls fell to the ground. By repeatedly measuring the distance between them, scientists can calculate the orbits of the Earth and the moon around the sun relative to each other. If the equivalence principle were violated, the moon"s orbit around the Earth would not appear straight, either towards or away from the sun So far, Dr Murphy told the conference, these experiments have merely confirmed the equivalence principle to one part in 10 trillion. Dr Murphy and his colleagues hope that even more precise measurements could ultimately show general relativity to be only approximately correct. This would usher in a new revolution in physics.
单选题 It is stated in Paragraph 1 that the theory of relativity
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:事实细节题。根据题干定位在第一段。该段第二句讲到科学家们无法(failed to)将爱因斯坦的广义相对论和他开创的量子力学有机地统一起来(fit),C项符合。A项说法过于绝对,在第一段中无明确根据,故排除;B项failed Einstein与原文表述不符;D项描述的是gravity的作用,排除。
单选题 Scientists present at the "Rethinking Gravity" conference
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:事实细节题。根据“Rethinking Gravity”conference定位到第二段。可以发现该大会的目的是找出爱因斯坦的广义相对论(关于引力的理论)的错误(erred),D项的flaws与原文相符。A项unanimously过于绝对,与原文中many scientists不符;B项时态为现在完成时,说明科学家们已经找到错误,同样与原文不符;C项质疑的对象错误,质疑的不是“广义相对论的假设前提”,而是“广义相对论”本身。
单选题 Galileo Galilei"s experiment at the Tower of Pisa around 400 years ago
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:事实细节题。根据Galileo Galilei和400 years ago定位到第三段。其中提到大约400年前伽利略在比萨斜塔的著名实验证明了等效原理,C项与此意相同。A项“是检验爱因斯坦广义相对论的一种方法”与第三段首句内容不符,故排除;B项“证明了物体的质量和成分毫无意义”属于推理过度:伽利略的实验是为了证明“在重力作用下,所有物体不分质量或成分,都具有相同的加速度”,不是宽泛地讲引力的作用,故D排除。
单选题 Tom Murphy and his colleagues fire laser beams at reflectors on the moon with the aim to
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:事实细节题,考查目的细节。根据Tom Murphy定位到第四段。该段紧承第三段,从该段首句A moreprecise test requires a taller tower可知,下文所说的Tom Murphy和他的同事所做的激光实验是为了更精确地论证等效原理,故D项正确。A项“测量地月之间的距离”和C项“检测激光穿过月球所需要的时间”不是文中提到的test的目的。而是其步骤;B项“计算光的速度”和文中“光速已知”不符。
单选题 What can we infer from the last paragraph?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:推理判断题。最后一段中作者指出现代科学家所做的试验“仅仅在10万亿分之一的概率上证实了等效原理”,也就是说还需要更多试验来检验该理论,C项与之相符。A项文中并未提到,属凭空臆测;文中只说到“通过反复不断地测量地月之间的距离,科学家可以计算出地球和月球相对彼此围绕太阳公转的轨道”并没有说“计算绕转轨道说明等效原理被违背”,故B项错误;D项对文章末句理解错误,该变革还没发生。