PassageTwo
Questions51 to 55 are based on the following passage.
It is the season for some frantic last-minute math--across the country,employees of all stripes are counting backward in an attempt to figure out justhow much paid time-off they have left in their reserves. More of them, though,will skip those calculations altogether and just power through the holidaysinto 2017: More than half of American workers don t use up all of theirallotted vacation days each year.
Not so long ago, people would have turned up their noses at that kind ofdedication to the Job. As marketing professors Silvia Bellezza, Neeru Paharia,and Anat Keinan recently explained in Harvard Business Review (HBR), leisuretime was once seen as an indicator of high social status, something attainableonly for those at the top. Since the middle of the 20th century, though, thingshave turned the opposite way--these days, punishing hours at your desk, ratherthan days off, are seen as the mark of someone important.
In a series of several experiments, the researchers illustrated just howmuch we've come to admire busyness, or at least the appearance of it.Volunteers read two passages, one about a man who led a life of leisure andanother about a man who was over-worked and over-scheduled; when asked todetermine which of the two had a higher social status, the majority of theparticipants said the latter. The same held true for people who used productsthat implied they were short on time: In one experiment, for example, customersof the grocery-delivery service Peapod were seen as of higher status thanpeople who shopped at grocery stores that were equally expensive; in another,people wearing wireless headphones were considered further up on the socialladder than those wearing regular headphones, even when both were just used tolisten to music.
In part, the authors wrote in HBR, this pattern may have to do with theway work itself has changed over the past several decades.
We think that the shift from leisure-as-status to busyness-as-status maybe linked to the development of knowledge-intensive economics. In such economies, individuals whopossess the human capital characteristics that employers or clients value (e.g., competence and ambition) are expected to be in high demand and short supplyon the job market. Thus, by telling others that we are busy and working all thetime, we are implicitly suggesting that we are sought after, which enhances ourperceived status.
Even if you feel tempted to sacrifice your own vacation days for fakebusyness, though, at least consider leaving your weekends unscheduled. it's foryour own good.
What do most employees plan to dotowards the end of the year?
根据题干关键词可以定位至第一段第二句话。该句指出,他们当中的大多数人会直接忽略计算自己的假期,保持“鸡血”状态在假期工作,直接进入2017年。超过半数的美国工人每年都休不完各项规定假期。因此,B项正确,同时排除A项。选项C以及选项D均未有所提及,属于无中生有。故排除。
How would people view dedication towork in the past?
根据题干关键词可以定位至第二段第一句话。该句指出,不久以前,人们对那种献身工作的态度还是嗤之以鼻。需要注意,C项中的look upon it with contempt 是原文中turn up their nose的同义转述,故而选C。此外,A,B,D项在原文均未有所提及,可直接排除。
What did the researchers find through aseries of experiments?
根据题干信息定位至第三段。该段第一句指出,研究人员通过一系列的实验表明我们对繁忙或至少是繁忙表面的崇拜之情。第二句实验结果表明,大部分人认为工作越是繁忙的人社会地位会越高。故选项A正确。由此可以判断B项中的exploited(被剥削)用词错误。C项知识与能力的关系未提及,故排除。D项是原文中对过去社会观点的总结,并非实验结论,故排除。
What may account for the change ofpeople's attitude towards being busy?
根据题干中关键词可以定位至倒数第二段第一句话,该句指出,我们认为,从“闲暇是地位象征”到“繁忙是地位象征”的这种转变,可能与知识密集型经济的发展相关。故D项表述符合原文意思,属于正确选项。A,B,C项原文均未有所谈及,可直接排除。
What does the author advise us to do atthe end of the passage?
根据题干定位至最后一段。作者在该段建议我们,考虑不要给周末安排工作计划,并且强调这是为了我们好。言外之意,就是希望我们周末能够让自己休息,放松自己。故C项符合题意。