单选题 {{B}}Text 3{{/B}}
Fate has not been kind to the western grey whale. Its numbers have dwindled to 130 or so, leaving it “critically endangered” in the eyes of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature. Fishing-nets, speeding ships, pollution and coastal development threaten the few that remain. Most recently, drilling for oil and gas in their main summer feeding grounds, near Sakhalin island off Russia’s Pacific coast, has brought fresh risks for the luckless creatures. Yet the rush to develop Sakhalin’s offshore fields may yet be the saviour of the species.
When drilling was first discussed in the 1990s, there were muted complaints. When a consortium called Sakhalin. Energy, led by Royal Dutch Shell, announced plans to build an oil platform and lay pipelines in the only bay where the whales were known to congregate, these protests proliferated.
In response, the consortium established an independent panel to advise it on how best to protect the whales and promised to fund its work. It subsequently agreed to change the route of the pipeline at the panel’s suggestion, although it refused to move the platform, as other critics had demanded. It also agreed either to follow the panel’s recommendations in future or to explain publicly why it was rejecting them.
The platforms and pipelines are now complete. Sakhalin Energy exported its first cargo of liquefied natural gas last week. The project, says Shell, is an engineering triumph and a commercial success despite all the controversy.
But has it been a success for the whales? Sakhalin Energy says their number seems to be growing by 2.5% a year, although Ian Craig, the firm’s boss, admits that the cause might be greater scrutiny rather than population growth. The scientists on the panel still seem worried. They complain that the firm has not always provided the information they need to assess the threat to the whales. It also has not always followed advice, the scientists’ advice about how noisy construction might scare the animals away, for example, or the speed that boats should travel to minimize the risk of hitting the whales. The scientists warn that the loss of just a few fertile females would be enough to tip the population into irrevocable decline. Last summer, there seemed to be far fewer whales around than normal.
On the other hand, the panel knows this only because Sakhalin Energy funds lots of research on the whales. As a result, it has discovered that they have a wider range than originally thought, which might explain why so few of them showed up off Sakhalin island last year.
Therefore, it is hard to escape the conclusion that, for creatures with a lot as sorry as the western grey whale, a nearby oil project is something of a blessing.
单选题 Why are Sakhalin’s offshore oil and gas projects regarded as risks for the western grey whale?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[设题点] 段尾处 [解析] 推理判断题。由题干关键词将信息定位于第一段倒数第二句。该句谈到,在鲸鱼夏季主要觅食地进行的石油和天然气的开采为灰鲸带去了新的危险;由此推断,危险的原因是石油和天然气工程会直接威胁到灰鲸夏季的栖息地,故[A]正确,habitat是原文feeding ground的同义转述。[B]、 [C]、[D]可能是潜在的危险,但仅是推测,在原文中找不到充分的依据,所以不是本题答案。
单选题 To ease the protest against its projects, Sakhalin Energy
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[设题点] 段首处 [解析] 事实细节题。由题干关键词to ease the protest,将信息定位于第三段第一句In response...。由该句可知[D]正确。[B]是强干扰项,但该项中的in charge of its public relationship(管理公共关系)原文未提及;由该段第二句可知[A]错误;原文也没提到萨哈林能源公司反对自己在萨哈林海域的工程,故[C]不对。
单选题 Sakhalin Energy supports the panel’s work
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[设题点] 段首句,复杂句处 [解析] 推理判断题。由第三段首句可知萨哈林能源公司承诺要为专家组的工作提供资金支持;同时文章在第五段第四句的复杂句处又提到,专家们抱怨该集团有时不给他们提供研究所需的信息,也不听他们的建议。综合两处,可知[C]正确。[A]“无条件地”、[B]“热情地”、[D]“认真地”与文章中的语气不符。
单选题 Scientists are sure that
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[设题点] 复杂句处 [解析] 事实细节题。倒数第二段末句为一个多重复合句,该句提到,专家组发现灰鲸有了更广阔的活动区域,所以去年夏天在萨哈林岛海域只发现了数量很少的灰鲸。所以,[D]正确。萨哈林能源公司称,灰鲸的数量每年似乎增长了2.5%,但并不确定,且不是科学家们的看法,故排除[A];[B]、[C]分别是对第五段第二句和倒数第二句的错误理解。
单选题 An appropriate title for the passage is most likely to be
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[设题点] 首段,尾段 [解析] 主旨大意题。作者在首段末句便提出了自己的观点:对萨哈林油田的开发可能成为灰鲸的救星;接着整篇文章都在论证油田的开发是如何给灰鲸带去福音的;文章末尾,作者又重申了油田开发对灰鲸来说是一件好事。整篇文章既谈到了近海油田开发带来的威胁,又谈到了带来的好处,故[B]最适合做文章标题。