单选题
{{B}}Part A{{/B}}
{{B}}Directions:{{/B}}
Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1.
{{B}}Text 1{{/B}}
"I've never met a human worth cloning," says cloning expert Mark Westhusin from the cramped confines of his lab at Texas A & M University. "It's a stupid endeavor.' That's an interesting choice of adjective, coming from a man who has spent millions of dollars trying to clone a 13-year-old dog named Missy. So far, he and his team have not succeeded, though they have cloned two calves and expect to clone a cat soon. They just might succeed in cloning Missy later this year--or perhaps not for another five years. It seems the reproductive system of man's best friend is one of the mysteries of modem science.
Westhusin's experience with cloning animals leaves him vexed by all this talk of human cloning. In three years of work on the Missyplicity project, using hundreds upon hundreds of canine eggs, the A&M team has produced only a dozen or so embryos carrying Missy's DNA. None have survived the transfer to a surrogate mother. The wastage of eggs and the many spontaneously aborted fetuses may be acceptable when you're dealing with cats or bulls, he argues, but not with humans. "Cloning is incredibly inefficient, and also dangerous," he says.
Even so, dog cloning is a commercial opportunity, with a nice research payoff. Ever since Dolly, the sheep, was cloned in 1997, Westhusin's phone at A&M College of Veterinary Medicine has been ringing busily. Cost is no obstacle for customers like Missy's mysterious owner, who wishes him remain unknown to protect his privacy. He's plopped down $ 3. 7 million so far to fund the research because he wants a twin to carry on Missy's fine qualities after she dies. But he knows her clone may not have her temperament. In a statement of purpose, Missy's owner and the A&M team say they are "both looking forward to studying the ways that her clone differs from Missy."
The fate of the dog samples will depend on Westhusin's work. He knows that even if he gets a dog viably pregnant, the offspring, should they survive, will face the problems shown at birth by other cloned animals: abnormalities like immature lungs and heart and weight problems. "Why would you ever want to clone humans," Westhusin asks, "when we're not even close to getting it worked out in animals yet?"
单选题 Which of the following best represents Mr. Westhusin's attitude toward cloning?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】观点态度题。本文询问Mr. Westhusin对于克隆的态度。文章开篇就道出了其观点,即“I've never met a human worth cloning”,之后,他又指出“It's a stupid endeavor”。由此可知,Westhusin反对克隆人而非克隆动物,所以不选A。但文章中对其所在实验室克隆动物没有表示反对观点,所以选D。文章中没有提到克隆应该被禁止,不选C。B与文章中最后一句话矛盾,所以也不选。
单选题 The Missyplicity project does not seem very successful probably because
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】细节推断题。题干问,Missyplicity项目不成功的可能原因是什么,文中第一段提到,尽管他们克隆了两头小牛,并很快将克隆出一只猫,但克隆狗或许在五年内都不会成功。克隆狗“仍然是现代科学中的一个未解之谜”。可见克隆狗比克隆猫和牛困难,B符合此义。A项不对,该研究资金没有任何问题,文章中第三段已经说明(Cost is no obstacle for...);D项与第三段最后一句话矛盾;C项无任何依据,均不选。
单选题 When Mr. Westhusin says "cloning is dangerous," he implies that
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】细节题。题干中的信号词是“cloning is dangerous”,定位在文章第二段最后一句。整句话大意为“当你在克隆猫和牛的时候,浪费许多卵子和胚胎都能让人接受”。言外之意就是说我们在克隆人的时候,是不可能拿人的生命来做实验的。故选C。A,B,D三项文中均未提及。
单选题 We can infer from the third paragraph that
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】推论题。题干中的信号词是“third paragraph”,也就是文章的第三段。该段指出,自从1997年Dolly克隆羊成功克隆之后,Westhusin所在的实验室的电话就一直响个不停,因为有许多人愿意花费巨金克隆其宠物。本文以狗Missy为例,说明了现在克隆宠物正成为一个很有前途的产业。故选B。
单选题 We may conclude from the text that
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】主旨题。本文探讨的是克隆技术,专家Westhusin认为克隆人目前是愚蠢的,更是危险的,技术尚未成熟。文章以克隆狗Missy为例,说明对于某些动物的克隆我们至今都未能成功,更何况是克隆人。故得出选项A正确。