单选题
No company likes to be told it is contributing to the moral
decline of a nation. "Is this what you like to accomplish with your careers?" an
American senator asked Time Warner executives recently. "You have sold your
souls, but must you corrupt our nation and threaten our children as well?" At
Time Warner, however, such questions are simply the latest manifestation of the
soul-searching that has involved the company ever since the company was born in
1990. It's a self-examination that has, at different times, involved issues of
responsibility, creative freedom and the corporate bottom line.
At the core of this debate is chairman Gerald Levin, 56, who took over from the
late Steve Ross in the early 1990s. On the financial front, Levin is under
pressure to raise the stock price and reduce the company's mountainous debt,
which will increase to $17.3 billion after two new cable deals close. He has
promised to sell off some of the property and restructure the company, but
investors are waiting impatiently. The flap over rap is not making
life any easier for him. Levin has consistently defended the company's rap music
on the grounds of expression. In 1992, when Time Warner was under fire for
releasing Ice-T's violent rap song Cop Killer, Levin described rap as a
lawful expression of street culture, which deserves an outlet. "The test of any
democratic society," he wrote in a Wall Street Journal column," lies
not in how well it can control expression but in whether it gives freedom of
thought and expression the widest possible latitude, however disputable or
irritating the results may sometimes be. We won't retreat when we face any
threats." Levin would not comment on the debate last week, but
there were signs that the chairman was backing off his hard-line stand, at least
to some extent. During the discussion of rock singing verses at last month's
stockholders' meeting, Levin asserted that "music is not the cause of society's
ills" and even cited his son, a teacher in the Bronx, New York, who uses rap to
communicate with students. But he talked as well about the "balanced struggle"
between creative freedom and social responsibility, and he proclaimed that the
company would launch a drive to develop standards for distribution and labeling
of potentially objectionable music. The 15-member Time Warner
board is generally supportive of Levin and his corporate strategy. But insiders
say some of them have shown their concerns in this matter. "Some of us have
known for many, many years that the freedoms under the First Amendment are not
totally unlimited," says Luce. "I think it is perhaps the case that some people
associated with the company have only recently come to realize this."
单选题
An American senator criticized Time Warner for
单选题
In 1992, Time Warner caused public outrage because it
A.sacked workers as a result of restructuring.
B.issued a record promoting violence.
C.advocated the culture of the street.
D.challenged the freedom of expression in democratic society.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】[解析] 从文章第二段可知:In 1992, when Time Warner was wider fire for releasing Ice-T's violent rap song cop killer. 1992年。Time warner因为出版发行了“冰T”的暴力倾向的说唱音乐《警察杀手》而遭到各方批评攻击。Time Warner“引起民怨”,主要是因为他出版了鼓励暴力的唱片。
单选题
In the face of recent attacks on the company, Levin
A.stuck to a strong stand to defend freedom of expression.
B.softened his tone and introduced a new initiative.
C.yielded to objections and resigned from the company.
D.requested unconditional support from the 15-member board.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】[解析] 文章第四段:but there were signs that the chairman was backing off his hard-line stand.有痕象表明,主席放弃了他的强硬立场。口气变软,推出了新方案。
单选题
We can infer from the last paragraph that
A.profits and social responsibility can rarely go hand in hand in the
company.
B.few people are concerned about corporate responsibility.
C.the debate over Time Warner's policy will soon involve other
companies.
D.the Time Warner Board's opinion of the company's policy is
divided.