It was a foolish question to ask. It{{U}}
(61) {{/U}}more sense for me to have learned if she had{{U}} (62)
{{/U}}or a point of view, but it was{{U}} (63) {{/U}}for that now
and I supposed that the{{U}} (64) {{/U}}Relations Office had{{U}}
(65) {{/U}}her before granting the interview. I didn't have time this
week to read{{U}} (66) {{/U}}pieces about corporate rainmakers and their
golden parachutes or women at midtown law firms{{U}} (67) {{/U}}six
times my salary but whining about breaking the{{U}} (68)
{{/U}}ceiling. "Won't waste your time," she{{U}} (69) {{/U}}. "If the details on your{{U}} (70) {{/U}}are accurate and the articles Laura{{U}} (71) {{/U}}me have correct background, we won't have to{{U}} (72) {{/U}}that." I{{U}} (73) {{/U}}in approval. She was obviously a{{U}} (74) {{/U}}, and an intelligent one{{U}} (75) {{/U}}. It was always{{U}} (76) {{/U}}to sit for a{{U}} (77) {{/U}}when the questioner spent the first hour asking what schools I had{{U}} (78) {{/U}}, how long{{U}} (79) {{/U}}, and whether I liked my job. "Is it all right{{U}} (80) {{/U}}you if we start with some information about the Sex Crimes Prosecution Unit?" "I'd like that," I replied. |