In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We"re pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. We say our motives are selfless and sensible. A degree from Stanford or Princeton is the ticket for life. If Aaron and Nicole don"t get in, they"re forever doomed. Gosh, we"re delusional. I"ve twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. It"s the one-upmanship among parents. We see our kids" college rating as medals proving how well or how poorly we"ve raised them. But we can"t acknowledge that our obsession is more about us than them. So we"ve contrived various justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths. It actually doesn"t matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford. Admissions anxiety afflicts only a minority of parents. It"s true that getting into college has generally become tougher because the number of high-school graduates has grown. From 1994 to 2006, the increase is 28 percent. Still, 64 percent of freshmen attend schools where acceptance rates exceed 70 percent, and the application surge at elite schools dwarfs population growth. Take Yale. In 1994, it accepted 18.9 percent of 12,991 applicants; this year it admitted only 8.6 percent of 21,000. We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won"t be enough medals to go around. Fearful parents prod their children to apply to more schools than ever. "The epicenters (of parental anxiety) used to be on the coasts, Boston, New York, Washington, Los Angeles", says Tom Parker, Amherst"s admissions dean. "But it"s radiated throughout the country". Underlying the hysteria is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that"s plausible and mostly wrong. "We haven"t found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters", says Ernest T. Pascarella of the University of Iowa, co author of "How College Affects Students", an 827-page evaluation of hundreds of studies of the college experience. Selective schools don"t systematically employ better instructional approaches than less-selective schools, according to a study by Pascarella and George Kuh of Indiana University. Some do; some don"t. On two measures professors" feedback and the number of essay exams selective schools do slightly worse.
单选题 In the author"s eyes, parents pushing their kids to an elite degree are ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:本题涉及作者的相关观点。依据第一段,尤其末句,可知作者认为一味地推动孩子上名校是错误的。答案选项中的"misguided"对应第一段末句中的"delusional"。
单选题 We can infer from the second paragraph that ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:这是一道推论题。依据第二段的前三句可以看出,孩子能不能上名校被视为能反映父母的教育是否成功。可以推论,"孩子不能被挑剔的名校录取将令家长颜面扫地",这正是答案选项的意思。答案项中的"reflect well/badly on"是短语,意思是"反映或显出某人能/不能(行/不行)"。干扰项"教育良好的孩子与教育欠佳的孩子之间具有强烈的竞争"似乎有道理,但不是文章所暗示的意思,故予排除。
单选题 Which of the following statements is true according to the text?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:这是一道是非判断题,基于上下题,可以初步认定答案在第三段。其第一句说,只有少部分家长为孩子录取而焦虑,反过来说就是答案选项的内容(多数家长确信孩子还是能够上大学的)。选项"High school graduates find…"不准确,至多上名校困难。选项"Fewer high school graduates…"与文章意思相反,选项"Parents on the coasts…"时态不对应原文。
单选题 According to Ernest T. Pascarella, elite schools ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:这是一道细节题,问Ernest T. Pasearella对名校有何看法。由末尾段中Ernest所言可知,他认为名校并不能保证孩子一定能成功。选项(名校辜负了它们的名气)夸大扭曲了Ernest对名校的看法,予以排除。
单选题 All of the following words are used to describe the author"s views of parents EXCEPT ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:本题问:下面哪个选项不是作者对家长的评价。焦虑、错觉、执拗都是作者对家长的评价,唯独"合情合理的"是第一段中家长们对自己的看法,不是作者的看法,故为本题答案。