单选题 Not too many decades ago it seemed "obvious" both to the general public and to sociologists that modern society has changed people's natural relations, loosened their responsibilities to kin (亲戚) and neighbors, and substituted in their place superficial relationships with passing acquaintances. However, in recent years a growing body of research has revealed that the "obviousness" is not tree. It seems that if you are a city resident, you typically know a smaller proportion of your neighbors than you do if you are a resident of a smaller community. But, for the most part, this fact has few significant consequences. It does not necessarily follow that if you know few of your neighbors you will know no one else.
Even in very large cities, people maintain close social ties within small, private social worlds. Indeed, the number and quality of meaningful relationships do not differ between more and less urban people. Small-town residents are more involved with kin than big-city residents. Yet city dwellers compensate by developing friendships with people who share similar interests and activities. Urbanism may produce a different style of life, but the quality of life does not differ between town and city. Nor are residents of large communities any likelier to display psychological symptoms of stress or alienation, a feeling of not belonging, than are residents of smaller communities. However, city dwellers do worry more about crime, and this leads them to a distrust of strangers.
These findings do not imply that urbanism makes little or no difference. If neighbors are strangers to one another, they are less likely to sweep the sidewalk of an elderly couple living next door or keep an eye out for young troublemakers. Moreover, as Wirth suggested, there may be a link between a community's population size and its social heterogeneity (多样性). For instance, sociologists have found that the size of a community is associated with bad behavior including gambling, drugs, etc. Large-city urbanites are also more likely than their small-town counterparts to have a cosmopolitan (见多识广者的) outlook, to display less responsibility to traditional kinship roles, to vote for leftist political candidates, and to be tolerant of nontraditional religious groups, unpopular political groups, and so-called undesirables. Everything considered, heterogeneity and unusual behavior seem to be outcomes of large population size.

单选题 Which of the following statements best describes the organization of the first paragraph?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题可以算是一道主旨题。它问本文第1段的组织结构是什么,其实是问第1段的主旨大意。A项意为“提出两种相反的观点”,最为恰当地概括了第1段的内容。
单选题 According to the passage, it was once a common belief that urban residents ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 本题为推理题。文章开头就明确提出:过去人们普遍认为现代社会改变了人们自然形成的人际关系,亲戚和邻居之间变得冷漠,代之以与认识的过路人一样肤浅、表面的关系。B项说“不再形成持久、深入的人际关系”,显然B项与原文相符。
单选题 One of the consequences of urban life is that impersonal relationships among neighbors ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本题为推理题。题干中的impersonal意为“没有感情的”;A项中disrupt意为“使分裂,使中断,使陷入混乱”。根据第3段第2句话可知C项正确。A项的错误在于并非邻里之间的冷漠导致人们原来自然的关系中断,二者不是因果关系。邻居关系的疏远也不是他们担心犯罪的原因,也没有造成邻里之间互相猜疑。
单选题 It can be inferred from the passage that the bigger a community is, ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本题为推理题。C项正是文章最后几句话的概括。A项与第2段第5句话(but the quality of life doesn't differ between town and city)相悖:D项与第2段第6句话(Nor are residents...)意思相反。
单选题 What is the passage mainly about?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题为主旨题。本文第1段先提出两种相反的观点,随后便一直在论证第2种观点,即讨论A项的内容。