单选题 That everyone"s too busy these days is a cliché. But one specific complaint is made especially mournfully: There"s never any time to read.
What makes the problem thornier is that the usual time-management techniques don"t seem sufficient. The web"s full of articles offering tips on making time to read: "Give up TV" or "Carry a book with you at all times." But in my experience, using such methods to free up the odd 30 minutes doesn"t work. Sit down to read and the flywheel of work-related thoughts keeps spinning—or else you"re so exhausted that a challenging book"s the last thing you need. The modern mind, Tim Parks, a novelist and critic, writes, "is overwhelmingly inclined toward communication... It is not simply that one is interrupted; it is that one is actually inclined to interruption." Deep reading requires not just time, but a special kind of time which can"t be obtained merely by becoming more efficient.
In fact, "becoming more efficient" is part of the problem. Thinking of time as a resource to be maximized means you approach it instrumentally, judging any given moment as well spent only in so far as it advances progress toward some goal. Immersive reading, by contrast, depends on being willing to risk inefficiency, goallessness, even time-wasting. Try to slot it as a to-do list item and you"ll manage only goal-focused reading— useful, sometimes, but not the most fulfilling kind. "The future comes at us like empty bottles along an unstoppable and nearly infinite conveyor belt," writes Gary Eberle in his book Sacred Time , and "we feel a pressure to fill these different-sized bottles (days, hours, minutes) as they pass, for if they get by without being filled, we will have wasted them." No mind-set could be worse for losing yourself in a book.
So what does work? Perhaps surprisingly, scheduling regular times for reading. You"d think this might fuel the efficiency mind-set, but in fact, Eberle notes, such ritualistic behavior helps us "step outside time"s flow" into "soul time". You could limit distractions by reading only physical books, or on single-purpose e-readers. "Carry a book with you at all times" can actually work, too—providing you dip in often enough, so that reading becomes the default state from which you temporarily surface to take care of business, before dropping back down. On a really good day, it no longer feels as if you"re "making time to read," but just reading, and making time for everything else.
单选题 The usual time-management techniques don"t work because ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 推理判断题。根据题干中的关键词the usual time-management可以定位到原文第二段首句。该句指出通常的时间管理技巧似乎难以奏效,接着作者借助个人体验阐述网络上的各种找时间阅读的建议并不能解决问题,该段最后一句指出,深度阅读需要的不只是时间,更是一种特殊的时间,仅仅变得更加有效率也不能获得的那种时间,由此可知,通常的时间管理技巧提供的抽时间阅读的方式不具备深度阅读需要的条件,因为深度阅读不、只是需要时间而已,故D项为答案。A、B两项原文未提及,而C项内容与原文意思相反,原文说即便网上有人建议随身携带一本书,但是这种方法也并不能奏效,故三项均排除。
单选题 The "empty bottles" metaphor illustrates that people feel a pressure to ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 语义理解题。根据题干中的关键词empty bottles可定位到原文第三段倒数第二句。该句引述了加里·埃伯利的著作《神圣的时间》中的关于“空瓶子”的隐喻,埃伯利把未来的时间比作传输带上源源不断涌来的空瓶子,人们总会感到一种压力,即要把空瓶子填满,如果不填满,就觉得是一种浪费,由此可判断,这里是指人们会有要使流逝的时间过得充实的压力,本题应选B。
单选题 Eberle would agree that scheduling regular times for reading helps ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 推理判断题。文章末段开头以自问自答的方式提及自己的主张,即安排有规律的阅读时间,下文又提到埃伯利指出例行公事的行为有助于我们“从时间流中跳出来”进入“灵魂时间”,即进入沉浸式阅读状态,故本题应选D。作者提到“你会认为这可能助长了效率心态”,从这个句子的语气来看,作者对此是持否定态度的,故A项排除;B项文中没有提及,故排除;C项应该是表现形式,而不是目的,故也排除。
单选题 "Carry a book with you at all times" can work if ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 事实细节题。末段提到,“随时随身携带一本书”事实上也会奏效—前提是你得经常专注于阅读,足以令阅读成为一种默认状态,在你恢复到阅读状态之前,你只是暂时性地从阅读中跳出来,处理一下事情。由此可知,作者认为只有当你把阅读当作主要事务时,“随时随身携带一本书”才能够奏效,故本题选A。
单选题 The best title for this text could be ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 主旨大意题。本题询问文章的最佳标题是哪一项,需要结合全文的内容来判定,文章首先提出了人们普遍性的抱怨,即没有时间阅读,然后对此进行了批驳,人们并非没有时间阅读,而是没有安排有规律的阅读时间,没有让阅读成为一种默认状态。时间在文中不断被提及,是全文的主题词,由此可知,四个选项中B项“如何找时间阅读”符合文章中心大意,应为文章最佳标题,故本题选B。