问答题 4.  It is generally accepted that people should visit their aged parents regularly if they live separately. But whether this requirement should be written into law has always been a controversial matter. And then not quite long ago, China issued a decree that requires children to pay regular visit to their parents. The following is an excerpt on this decree. Read it carefully and write an article of NO LESS THAN 300 words, in which you should:
    1. summarize briefly the excerpt, and then
    2. give your comment.
    Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
    Write your article on ANSWER SHEET FOUR.
    Not long ago, China issued a decree. According to the new legislation, parents have the legal right to request government mediation or even file a lawsuit against children who fail to regularly drop by for a visit or give them a phone call. The core intent of the law is "to protect the lawful rights and interests of parents aged 60 and older, and to carry on the Chinese virtue of filial piety."
    Unsurprisingly, the law has strong voices speaking for and against.
    "It is a great policy and I am very happy to see the government release such a policy to encourage children to fulfill their obligations to their parents," said Huang Kesheng, a 20-year-old student at Beijing's University of International Business and Economics.
    However, Bei Zhong, a late-20s white collar professional from Chongqing who works and lives in Shanghai, sees it differently. "I do not think there should be a law that requires people to visit their parents," she told a paper. "It gives the impression to other countries that Chinese people need a law to tell them they should visit their elders. It's quite embarrassing."
    Perhaps the controversial—some say silly—law should come as no surprise. After all, China gave the world Confucius—perhaps the most family-oriented philosopher in human history. Given the nation's Confucian foundations, the rift between its elderly and the post-1980s "me generation" has been especially felt when compared with similar changes that have taken place in other countries.
    Alongside the generational divide and deterioration of old-fashioned values, a major driving force behind China's Confucian fallout is urbanization, which often means moving far from home. This is especially true for young professionals like Zhong who are leaving the far flung corners of the country to congregate in economic hubs like Beijing or Shanghai. Simply put, this makes those filial visits both logistically difficult and often expensive.
    "How often I visit my parents depends on my schedule," Zhong said. "Last year I spent two months with them. But so far this year, I haven't even had the time to visit my parents yet. Flights are also very expensive." Zhong said that she, along with her friends, often resort to squeezing trips to their hometowns into the brief national holiday of Chinese New Year. It's worth noting that any travel at this time is no leisurely trips for pleasure. During this time China sees the world's largest human migration, with hundreds of millions of people crisscrossing the country and completely blocking its transportation networks.
    While some will wage a war against these trends, it is highly unlikely that they will stop the forces as powerful as China's urbanization and its growing generation gap. Thankfully for Chinese youth, some parents understand.
    "My mom and dad would never dream of demanding for me to visit," Zhong said. "They just want me to be happy."
【正确答案】[范文]
   
On Requiring Adult Children to Visit their Parents Regularly

   It is reported that China has made a law that requires adult children to visit their aged parents regularly in order to make the elderly parents feel warm at heart and promote the traditional Chinese virtue of filial piety. With regard to such a decree, some applaud it, believing that it can better make children fulfill their obligations while some other people hold opposite opinion as they deem that it's embarrassing that people should need a law to tell them to visit their elders. In my opinion, to formulate such a law is neither suitable nor effective.
   In the first place, "filial piety" is a moral obligation which should not be enforced by law. Whether the adult children should be filial to the parents or not remains better be discussed in the moral dimension, not the legal one. To legislate morality is not a good method to solve the widespread "empty nest elderly" problem in China. We should encourage citizens to visit their aged parents as frequently as possible, but not through legal enforcement.
   In the second place, law-makers should consider the reality that many adult children have little opportunity to visit their parents due to all-consuming jobs and few days off. To be filial to the parents is the traditional Chinese virtue which is still advocated and fulfilled by most Chinese people, especially the financially disadvantaged migrant workers, who are most willing to visit their parents frequently, but can't afford the time and money. It is unwise and unreasonable to force the adult children to visit their parents regularly at the cost of losing their jobs, which will only lead to the deterioration of the lives of both the parents and their children.
   Admittedly, the growing number of elderly people in China is really a big headache for the government. We should make efforts to find a good way to solve the problem. However, to formulate such a legal rule is not a good solution. Such enforced visits would be not only pointless but uncomfortable for both parties.
【答案解析】 题目给出一篇文章,主要关于孝道人法及人们对将孝道写入法律的看法。考生在总结文意时须注意不要被文中枝节信息所干扰,而应关注文中的关键信息。文章开头部分介绍了法律颁布的基本信息,接着具体举例说明不同人的意见,然后举例说明当前年轻人的境况,最后提出虽然颁布了法律,但有些父母会理解自己孩子,不会强制要求孩子探望自己。根据题目要求,考生可采取以下的作文布局:
   第一段:总结阅读材料中的不同观点,并提出自己的观点:将孝道写入法律,既不恰当也不能起作用。
   第二段:指出“孝道”是一种道义上的义务,不应通过法律进行强制。
   第三段:论述以丢掉工作为代价,迫使成年子女经常探访父母亲的做法既不明智也不合理,这只会导致父母和孩子的生活不断恶化。
   第四段:重申观点,指出我们应该努力寻找一个好方法来解决老人问题,将孝道写入法律并不是好的解决方法。
[参考译文]
   
关于要求成年子女定期拜访父母

   据称,中国已经制定一项法规,要求成年子女要经常探访他们年迈的父母亲,以使老人的内心感受到温暖,也借以弘扬孝道这一中华传统美德。对于这项法律,如上述阅读材料所讲,有些人表示赞同,因为这些人相信这能使孩子更好地履行自己的义务;而另一些人则持相反观点,他们认为需要法律提醒自己看望父母是一件令人尴尬的事。在我看来,制定这样一项法规既不恰当也不能起作用。
   首先,“孝道”是一种道义上的义务,不应通过法律强制执行。成年子女是否应该孝顺其父母,最好还是在道义层面上而不是法律层面上进行讨论。道德法律化并不是解决中国普遍存在的“空巢老人”问题的好方法。我们应该鼓励市民尽可能多地探访自家年迈的父母亲,但不应通过法律强制手段。
   其次,法律制定者应该考虑到这样一个事实,很多成年人之所以很少去探访父母亲,是因为耗尽精力的工作以及极少的假期。孝顺父母是中华民族的传统美德,它仍被大多数中国人民所提倡和遵循,特别是经济贫困的农民工,他们是最愿意经常探访父母的人,但是他们支付不起时间和金钱。以丢掉工作为代价,迫使成年子女经常探访父母亲的做法是不明智且不合理的,这只会导致父母和孩子的生活不断恶化。
   诚然,不断增长的老年人口对中国政府来说,确实是一大难题。我们应该努力寻找一个好方法来解决这个问题。但是,制定这样一项法规并不是好的解决方法。这种强制性的探访不但没有意义,而且会让父母和孩子不自在。