单选题
Germs(细菌)on Banknotes

People in different countries use different types of money: yuan in China, pesos in Mexico, pounds in the United Kingdom, dollars in the United States, Australia and New Zealand. They may use different currencies, but these countries, and probably all countries, still have one thing in 1 : germs on the banknotes.
Scientists have been studying the germs on money for well over 100 years. At the turn of the 20th 2 , some researchers began to suspect that germs living on money could spread disease.
Most studies of germy money have looked at the germs on the currency 3 one country. In a new study, Frank Vriesekoop and other researchers compared the germ populations found on bills of different 4 .
Vriesekoop is a microbiologist at the University of Ballarat in Australia. He led the study, which compared the germ populations found on money 5 from 10 nations. The scientists studied 1,280 banknotes in total; all came from places where people buy food, like supermarkets, street vendors and cafes, 6 those businesses often rely on cash.
Overall, the Australian dollars hosted the fewest live bacteria—no more than 10 per square centimeter. Chinese yuan had the 7 —about 100 per square centimeter. Most of the germs on money probably would not cause harm.
What we call "paper money" 8 isn"t made from paper. The U.S. dollar, for example, is printed on fabric that is mostly cotton. Different countries may use different 9 to print their money. Some of the currencies studied by Vriesekoop and his team, such as the American dollar, were made from cotton. Others were made from polymers.
The three 10 with the lowest numbers of bacteria were all printed on polymers. They included the Australian dollar, the New Zealand dollar and some Mexican pesos.
The 11 currencies were printed on fabric made mostly of cotton. Fewer germs lived on the polymer notes. This 12 suggests that germs have a harder time staying alive on polymer surfaces. Scientists need to do more studies to understand 13 germs live on money—and whether or not we need to be concerned. Vriesekoop is now starting a study that will 14 the amounts of time bacteria can stay alive on different types of bills.
Whatever Vriesekoop finds, the fact remains: Paper money 15 germs. We should wash our hands after touching it; After all, you never know where your money"s been. Or what"s living on it.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 前文说了很多不同国家钞票的不同,最后一个转折,肯定是要说相同的地方。in common是固定搭配,意为“相同,共同”。故选C项common.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 选century最合理,意为“20世纪初”。period(A项),year(B项)或decade(D项)放在此处都不合逻辑。故选C项century.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 本段第二句提供了解答本题的线索。Frank Vriesekoop的研究与以前的科学家的研究不同,他比较了各国钱币上的病菌数量,在他之前的科学家的研究范围局限于一个国家的纸币。四个选项中只有within表达“在(一个国家)里”的意思。故选B项within.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 经过上一题选词的思索过程,本题很自然在different之后用countries,指不同的国家。故选A项countries.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 上一句说Vriesekoop比较不同国家纸币携带病菌的数量。本题的句子明确指出他对比的纸币涉及10个国家。四个选项中只有gathered(收集)与上下文的意思相匹配。故选D项gathered.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 填词所在的句子与前面的主句存在因果关系。为什么要从超市和食品摊收集纸币呢?因为这些地方常要用现金支付。所以本题答案是A项because.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 上一句中说澳元携带最少的细菌,本句与上一句是相对的,肯定是最多的,选A项most.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本句的句意为:“我们所说的纸币其实并不是由纸做的。”本题所选的副词用来修饰“所说”,四个选项分别是A项“相似地”;B项“简直不”;C项“轻微地”;D项“通常地”。所以选D项usually合适。
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本段说纸币的材料一般不是纸,通常是用棉花织物或高分子聚合物制作的。所以C项materials(材料、原料)是正确的。
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 前文说了不同国家的纸币携带的细菌数量不同,此处选B项“货币”最为合适。填入后全句意为:“含细菌最少的三个国家的纸币……”。故选B项currencies.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] the other+名词表示“其他的……”。其他选项从语法上无法与the搭配。此句意为:“其他纸币大部分是印在棉织物上的”。所以选D项other.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本句前面两句讲述了细菌在什么样的介质上更容易存活。承接下来的应该是对之前的总结。本句四个选项的含义分别为A项“连接”;B项“参与”;C项“表述”;D项“估计”。C选项比较合适,填入后句意为:“前面的表述说明细菌在聚合物表面不易存活”。故选C项expression.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 科学家要研究细菌如何在纸币上存活,所以本句选how. if(A项),where(B项),when(D项)都与文意不符。故选C项how.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] on different types of bills(在不同的纸币上)说明是比较关系,所以本句要选compare“比较”。故选B项compare.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 纸币和细菌的关系肯定是纸币携带细菌。avoid“避免”,kill“杀死”和select“选择”细菌都不正确。所以选C项carries.