单选题 During the past generation, the American middle-class family that once could count on hard work and fair play to keep itself financially secure had been transformed by economic risk and new realties. Now a pink slip, a bad diagnosis, or a disappearing spouse can reduce a family from solidly middle class to newly poor in a few months. In just one generation, millions of mothers have gone to work, transforming basic family economics. Scholars, policymakers, and critics of all stripes have debated the social implications of these changes, but few have looked at the side effect; family risk has risen as well. Today's families have budgeted to the limits of theirs new two-paycheck status. As a result, they have lost the parachuted they once had in times of financial setback—a back-up earner(usually Mom)who could go into the workforce if the primary earner got laid off or fell sick. This " added-worker effect" could support the safety net offered by unemployment insurance or disability insurance to help families weather bad times. But today, a disruption to family fortunes can no longer be made up with extra income from an otherwise stay at home partner. During the same period, families have been asked to absorb much more risk in their retirement income. Steelworkers, airline employees, and now those in the auto industry are joining millions of families who must worry about interest rates, stock market fluctuation, and the harsh reality that they may outlive their retirement money. For much of the past year, President Bush campaigned to move Social Security to a saving-account model, with retirees trading much or all of their guaranteed payments for payments depending on investment returns. For younger families the picture is not any better. Both the absolute cost of healthcare and the share of it borne by families have risen—and newly fashionable health-saving plans are spreading from legislative halls to Wal-Mart workers, with much higher deductibles and a large new dose of investment risk for families' future healthcare. Even demographics are working against the middle class family, as the odds of having a weak elderly parent—and all the attendant need for physical and financial assistance—have jumped eightfold in just one generation. From the middle-class family perspective, much of this, understandably, looks far less like an opportunity to exercise more financial responsibility, and a good deal more like a frightening acceleration of the wholesale shift of financial risk onto their already overburdened shoulders. The financial fallout has begun, and the political fallout may not be far behind.
单选题 Today's double-income families are at greater financial risk in that______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:本题是细节题。根据原文第二段可知他们更易于受到家庭经济变化的影响,故C正确。文章未提及disappear,可排除A。其他两项也与原文所述不符。
单选题 As a result of President Bush's reform, retired people may have______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:本题是细节题。根据题干中的布什总统定位到原文的第三段,从第三段的“President Bush campaigned to move Social Security…For younger families the picture is not anybetter.”可知,年轻家庭日子也不会好过,由此可推出退休职工日子不好过。故B项“安全性变差”与原文意思相符。
单选题 According to the author, health-savings plans will______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:本题是细节题。A项“有利于减少健康护理的成本”属于对词意的曲解,文中saving指的是“储蓄账户”,而非“减少成本”;B项“在中产阶级中非常普及”这一信息在文中未提及;原文的第三段提到“their guaranteed payments for payments depending oninvestment returns”,C项“补偿减少的养老金”与此意义相左;D项“增加了家庭投资的不确定性”是原文的同义替换。
单选题 It can be inferred from the last paragraph that______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:本题是推理题。根据选项,原文的最后一句提到“The financial fallout hasbegun,and the political fallout may not be far behind.”,经济上的副作用已经显现,那政治上的副作用可能也不远了。C项“经济问题可能引发政治问题”为此句的同义替换,其他三项均不对。
单选题 Which of the following is the best title for this text?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:本题是主旨题。A项on the alert“提防着,警戒”,与原文意义相反;C项inconflict“冲突”,文章中没有讲过冲突;D项in ruins“毁灭”,说明中产阶级已经崩溃,与原文不符。B项on the cliff“岌岌可危”符合原文,故B为正确答案。