American no longer expect public figures, whether in speech or in writing, to command the English language with skill and gift. Nor do they aspire to such command themselves. In his latest book, Doing Our Own Thing, the Degradation of language and Music and why we should like, care, John Me Whorter, a linguist and controversialist of mixed liberal and conservative views, sees the triumph of 1960 scounter-culture as responsible for the decline of formal English. But the cult of the authentic and the personal, "doing our own thing", has spelt the death of formal speech, writing, poetry and music. While even the modestly educated sought an elevated tone when they put pen to paper before the 1960s, even the most well regarded writing since then has sought to capture spoken English on the page. Equally, in poetry, the highly personal, performative gene is the only form that could claim real liveliness, in both oral and written English, talking is triumphing over speaking, spontaneity over craft. Illustrated with an entertaining array of examples from both high and low culture, the trend that Mr. McWhorter documents is unmistakable. But it is less clear, to take the question of his subtitle, why we should, like care. As a linguist, he acknowledges that all varieties of human language, including non-standard ones like Black English, can be powerfully expressive—there exists no language or dialect in the world that cannot convey complex ideas. He is not arguing, as many do, that we can no longer think straight because we do not talk proper. Russians have a deep love for their own language and carry large chunks of memorized poetry in their heads, while Italian politicians tend to elaborate speech that would seem old-fashioned to most English-speakers. Mr. McWhorter acknowledges that formal language is not strictly necessary, and proposes no radical education reforms—he is really grieving over the loss of something beautiful more than useful. We now take our English "on paper plates instead of china". A shame, perhaps, but probably an inevitable one.
单选题 According to Mc Whorter, the decline of formal English ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:文章第二段第二句中讲到,麦克沃特认为"whom"的消失是一种自然的现象,而"whom"的消失便是the decline of formal English的一个例子,B的意思是正式英语的没落在语言发展中只不过是非常自然的,与文意相符,所以B为答案,值得一提的是B中的but这里是副词,表示simply,only,merely的意思,如果将but理解为否定含义,则此题容易选错。
单选题 The word "talking"(Line 5, Paragraph 2) denotes
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:本段主要讲述了60年代以来不正式的英语取代了正式英语,并且从本句中也可以找到答案,从句子结构可以看出talking和spontaneity同义,speaking和craft同义,spontaneity是"自发,随意"的意思,所以talking指的是informality"不正式",答案为D。
单选题 To which of the following statements would McWhorter most likely agree?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:本题考查的是对文章第四段内容的理解,本段最后一句中谈到许多人认为由于我们谈话不准确,我们将不能有条理地思考,而麦克沃特则和他们不同,即,麦克沃特认为有逻辑的思考和说话方式没有必然关系,A项与此意相符,所以为答案。B是对本段第三句话前半部分的误解,文中说所有种类的语言,包括像黑人英语,都具有强大的表达能力,而并没有对黑人英语和标准英语的表达能力进行比较;C是对本段第一句话的错误理解,句中的entertaining指的是一些例子有趣,并不是说不标准的语言有趣;D则是对第三句的误解,文中指出麦克沃特认为所有语言都具有强大的表达能力,世上不存在无法传达复杂思想的语言或方言,即所有的语言都可以传递复杂的思想,没有好坏之分,所以D是不对的。
单选题 The description of Russians" love of memorizing poetry shows the author"s ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:本题应联系下文得出答案,本段首先提到了俄罗斯人喜欢记忆诗歌和意大利政治家喜欢做字斟句酌的演讲,这都是他们对使用正式语言所做出的努力。第二句中转而又说麦克沃特认为正式语言并不是必要的,但他确实为语言中那些美丽但并非有用的部分的遗失而感到忧伤,这说明作者认为尽管一些语言的变化是自然的,但对他们的努力还是很欣赏的,所以答案为B。文中并没有A和C的相关内容;虽然本段第一句中出现了old-fashioned一词,但这只是一个客观的陈述,并没有蔑视的意思,并且和下文中的grieving矛盾。
单选题 According to the last paragraph, "paper plates" is to "china" as ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:此题属于细节题,在做此题时我们应该先把错误的选项排除。A是错误地从字面意思理解了纸盘子和瓷盘子,认为一个使用的时间短,另一个则用得长久些,而没有联系上下文;B只是片面地抓住了文中出现的radical和conservative这两个词,而没有深入理解,radical在本段第二句中出现是形容教育改革的,conservative一词出现在第一段第三句中用来说明麦克沃特观点的,这两个词均与纸盘子和瓷盘子无关;D也是从纸盘子和瓷盘子字面意思联想到的想当然的结论。所以答案为C。