单选题 {{B}}第二篇{{/B}}
Oil and Economy

Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return? Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $ 26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock, when prices quadrupled, and 1979-1980, when they also almost tripled. Both previous shocks resulted in double-digit inflation and global economic decline. So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?
The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports. Strengthening economic growth, at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere ,' could push the price higher still in the short term.
Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s. In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the 1970s. In Europe, taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price, so even quite big changes in the price of crude have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past.
Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were, and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price. Energy conservation, a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption. Software, consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production. For each dollar of GDP (inconstant prices) rich economies now use nearly 50% less oil than in 1973.The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that, if oil prices averaged $ 22 a barrel for a full year, compared with $13 in 1998, this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25% - 0.5% of GDP. That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980.On the other hand, oil-importing emerging economies-to which heavy industry has shifted--have become more energy-intensive, and so could be more seriously squeezed.
One more reason not to lose sleep over the rise in oil prices is that, unlike the rises in the 1970s, it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand. A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline. The Economist's commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago. In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70% , and in 1979 by almost 30%.
单选题 The main reason for the latest rise of oil price is ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 第一段的第二句话:Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March,the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last, December.说明由于石油输出国决定降低供给量,使得油价上升。所以本题的答案是B。
单选题 It can be inferred from the text that the retail price of petrol will go up dramatically if ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 问题是:根据文中内容可以推断出汽油零售价将会大幅度增长,如果______。文章第三段提到,有足够的理由相信,石油供应量的减少对经济的影响比70年代要轻。与70年代相比,在多数国家,原油价格现在只占汽油价格的一小部分。在欧洲,税占零售价格的4/5,所以,即使原油价格大幅度增长,与过去相比对汽油价格的影响要小。本题是一个推理题,由以上的陈述作出推理,汽油价格高主要是税造成的,税高则价高,税少则价低。因此正确答案为D项。
单选题 The estimates in Economic Outlook show that in rich countries ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 根据本题的关键词“《经济展望》的估计”可以在倒数第二段中间找到相关信息,即油价的上涨对GDP的影响很小,只有“0.25%-0.5%”。因此我们可以得出答案D。
单选题 We can draw a conclusion from the text that ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 文章最后一段提到“这次油价上涨与20世纪70年代的上涨不同,对各国的影响也基本没有反映出来,连物价基本都没有变动”,也就是说,油价冲击已经不是那么可怕。所以答案是A。
单选题 From the text we can see that the writer seems ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 作者提到这次油价上涨的影响不大。尤其在第三段和最后一段的第一句话,强调人们不必担心此次油价上涨,由此可见作者的态度是“乐观的”。