Volcanoes were more destructive in ancient history, not because they were bigger, but because the carbon dioxide they released wiped out life with greater ease.
Paul Wignall from the University of Leeds was investigating the link between volcanic eruptions and mass extinctions. Not all volcanic eruptions killed off large numbers of animals, but all the mass extinctions over the past 300 million years coincided with huge formations of volcanic rock. To his surprise, the older the massive volcanic eruptions were, the more damage they seemed to do. He calculated the "killing efficiency" for these volcanoes by comparing the proportion of life they killed off with the volume of lava that they produced. He found that size for size, older eruptions were at least 10 times as effective at wiping out life as their more recent rivals.
The Permian extinction, for example, which happened 250 million years ago, is marked by floods of volcanic rock in Siberia that cover an area roughly the size of western Europe. Those volcanoes are thought to have pumped out about 10 gigatonnes of carbon as carbon dioxide. The global warming that followed wiped out 80 percent of all marine genera at the time, and it took 5 million years for the planet to recover. Yet 60 million years ago, there was another huge amount of volcanic activity and global warming but no mass extinction. Some animals did disappear but things returned to normal within ten thousands of years. "The most recent ones hardly have an effect at all," Wignall says. He ignored the extinction which wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, because many scientists believe it was primarily caused by the impact of an asteroid. He thinks that older volcanoes had more killing power—because more recent life forms were better adapted to dealing with increased levels of CO
2
.
Vincent Courtillot, director of the Paris Geophysical Institute in France, says that Wignall"s idea is provocative. But he says it is incredibly hard to do these sorts of calculations. He points out that the killing power of volcanic eruptions depends on how long they lasted. And it is impossible to tell whether the huge blasts lasted for thousands or millions of years. He also adds that it is difficult to estimate how much lava prehistoric volcanoes produced, and that lava volume may not necessarily correspond to carbon dioxide emissions.
单选题
Why did older volcanic eruptions do more damage than more recent ones?
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】[解析] 题意:为什么远古火山的破坏力大于新火山。第一段给出了原因“古代的火山更具破坏力,不是因为它们更大,而是因为它们释放出的二氧化碳更容易毁灭生命(because the carbon dioxide they released wiped out life with greater ease)”,所以A项“因为他们更容易毁灭生命”正确。
单选题
How did Wignall calculate the killing power of those older volcanic eruptions?
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】[解析] 题意:Wignall是如何计算出远古火山爆发的杀伤力的。第二段倒数第二句讲到“他通过比较火山释放出的熔岩的体积与杀死生命的比例计算这些火山的杀伤效力”(He calculated the "killing efficiency" for these volcanoes by comparing the proportion of life they killed off with the volume of lava that they produced.)。所以本题的答案是D。
单选题
When did dinosaurs become extinct?
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】[解析] 题意:恐龙是什么时候灭绝的。第三段倒数第二句中提到“He ignored the extinction which wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, because many scientists believe it was primarily caused by the impact of an asteroid.”,意思是:他并没有将6500万年前的恐龙灭绝计算在内,因为大部分的科学家认为那主要是由小行星撞击地球引起的。所以本题的答案是D。
单选题
What can be inferred from paragraph 3 concerning dinosaurs?
【答案解析】[解析] 题意:文章的主要论点是什么。文中的第一句话“Volcanoes were more destructive in ancient history, ...(古代火山更具破坏力)”是本文的论点,随后介绍了来自里兹大学的Paul Wignall的一项调查,即火山爆发和大规模物种灭绝之间的联系,最后他得出的结论是体积相同的情况下,远古火山要比近期火山的杀伤力大十倍,然后举例证明这一结论。所以本题的答案是B。