单选题 {{B}}Passage Four{{/B}}
The trouble with television is that it discourages concentration. Television's variety becomes a narcotic, not a stimulus. Its serial, kaleidoscopic exposures force us to follow its lead.The viewer is on a perpetual guided tour: 30 minutes at the museum, 30 at the cathedral, 30 for a drink, then back on the bus to the next attraction—except on the television, typically, the spans allotted are on the order of minutes or seconds, and the chosen delights are more often car crashes and people killing one another. In short, a lot of television usurps one of the most precious gifts, the ability to focus your attention yourself, rather than just passively surrender it.
Capturing your attention—and holding it—is the prime motive of most television programming and enhances its role as a profitable advertising vehicle. Programmers live in constant fear of losing anyone's attention. The surest way to avoid doing so is to keep everything brief, not to strain the attention of anyone but instead to provide constant stimulation through variety, novelty, action and movement. Quite simply, television operates on the appeal to the short attention span.
In the case of news, this practice, in my view, results in inefficient communication. I question how much of television's nightly news effort is really absorbable and understandable. Much of it is what has been aptly described as "machine-gunning with scraps." I think the technique fights coherence. I think it tends to make things ultimately boring and dismissible (unless they are accompanied by horrifying pictures) because almost anything is boring and dismissible if you know almost nothing about it.
I believe that TV's appeal to the short attention span is not only inefficient communication but decivilizing as well. Consider the casual assumptions that television tends to cultivate: that complexity must be avoided, that visual stimulation is a substitute for thought, that verbal precision is an anachronism. It may be old-fashioned, but I was taught that thought is words, arranged in grammatically precise ways.
There is a crisis of literacy in this country. One study estimates that some 30 million adult Americans are "functionally illiterate" and cannot read or write well enough to answer the want ad or understand the instructions on a medicine bottle. And while I would not be so simplistic as to suggest that television is the cause, I believe it contributes and is an influence.
多选题 In what way does TV discourage concentration, according to the text?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】细节题。文章开头就提出了这个问题:电视分散人们的注意力。然后接着进一步解释为什么:连续的、千变万化的电视画面迫使我们跟着它走,电视时间是以分或秒来计算的等。由此可知D符合这个意思,是正确答案。其他三个选项均与原文意思不符。
多选题 By describing news as "machine-gunning with scraps", the author means______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】细节题。这种题型一般需要结合上下文来得出正确答案。作者用“machine-gunning with scraps”(机关枪扫射碎片)来描述新闻,根据上文可知,电视节目是迎合人的注意力跨度短这一特点,节目简短,通过节目多样化、新颖性和动作来刺激人们。下文又说这种方法是与连贯性背道而驰的。因此可知新闻节日只是快速对众多互不相关的事件进行只言片语的报道,就像机关枪扫射一样,故选B。其他三个选项均不是原文本意,故都不对。
多选题 In the author's opinion, what kind of news programs will not ultimately become boring and dismissible?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】细节题。根据题干中的“boring”和“dismissible'’两个词,可知答案从第三段结尾处得出。作者认为机关枪扫射碎片式的新闻报道最终只会使得事情变得枯燥无味、不被考虑,因为人们看后对事情仍然是几乎一无所知。这就是说,只有对新闻进行深入的报道,使人们对事件有所了解,新闻节目才不会最终变得枯燥无味、不被考虑。因此本题正确答案选C。A(不断提供刺激的新闻),其实是与从机关枪扫射碎片式的新闻如出一辙,故不对;从文章中也可知,作者不赞成新闻报道靠恐怖画面来提高其吸引力,所以B也不对;D的内容在文章中没有提及,故也不是正确答案。
多选题 The author approves of the idea that______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】细节题。答案在从第四段中得出。作者认为电视迎合人们注意力跨度短会降低人们的文化水平,因为电视提出一些不经意的假设:必须避免复杂,视觉刺激会代替思考,语言准确不合时宜。作者最后说,这可能有些过时,但我所受的教育是:思想是准确语法排列的语言。也就是说,作者不赞成电视所提出的那些假设,而是认为电视应该传达用准确语言表达出的思想,因此 C是正确答案。
多选题 In this text, the author______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】主旨题。本题是问作者写作本文章的主要目的是什么。通读全文可知,作者主要是在讲电视 对美国社会的一些负面影响,如分散人们注意力、导致尤效交流、降低文化水平、造成功能性文盲等,旨在警告人们电视对美国文化的负面影响。因此A是正确答案。