单选题 Addiction is such a harmful behavior, in fact, that evolution should have long ago weeded it out of the population: if it's hard to drive safely under the influence, imagine trying to run from a saber-toothed tiger or catch a squirrel for lunch. And yet, says Dr. Nora Volkow, director of NIDA and a pioneer in the use of imaging to understand addiction, "the use of drugs has been recorded since the beginning of civilization. Humans in my view will always want to experiment with things to make them feel good. "
That's because drugs of abuse co-opt the very brain functions that allowed our distant ancestors to survive in a hostile world. Our minds are programmed to pay extra attention to what neurologists call salience--that is, special relevance. Threats, for example, are highly salient, which is why we instinctively try to get away from them. But so are food and sex because they help the individual and the species survive. Drugs of abuse capitalize on this ready-made programming. When exposed to drugs, our memory systems, reward circuits, decision-making skills and conditioning kick in--salience in overdrive--to create an all consuming pattern of uncontrollable craving. "Some people have a genetic predisposition to addiction," says Volkow. "But because it involves these basic brain functions, everyone will become an addict if sufficiently exposed to drugs or alcohol. "
That can go for nonchemical addictions as well. Behaviors, from gambling to shopping to sex, may start out as habits but slide into addictions. Sometimes there might be a behavior-specific root of the problem. Volkow's research group, for example, has shown that pathologically obese people who are compulsive eaters exhibit hyperactivity in the areas of the brain that process food stimuli--including the mouth, lips and tongue. For them, activating these regions is like opening the floodgates to the pleasure center. Almost anything deeply enjoyable can turn into an addiction, though.
Of course, not everyone becomes an addict. That's because we have other, more analytical regions that can evaluate consequences and override mere pleasure seeking. Brain imaging is showing exactly how that happens. Paulus, for example, looked at drug addicts enrolled in a VA hospital's intensive four-week rehabilitation program. Those who were more likely to relapse in the first year after completing the program were also less able to complete tasks involving cognitive skills and less able to adjust to new rules quickly. This suggested that those patients might also be less adept at using analytical areas of the brain while performing decision-making tasks. Sure enough, brain scans showed that there were reduced levels of activation in the prefrontal cortex, where rational thought can override impulsive behavior. It's impossible to say if the drugs might have damaged these abilities in the relapsers--an effect rather than a cause of the chemical abuse--but the fact that the cognitive deficit existed in only some of the drug users suggests that there was something innate that was unique to them. To his surprise, Paulus found that 80% to 90% of the time, he could accurately predict who would relapse within a year simply by examining the scans.
Another area of focus for researchers involves the brain's reward system, powered largely by the neurotransmitter dopamine. Investigators are looking specifically at the family of dopamine receptors that populate nerve cells and bind to the compound. The hope is that if you can reduce the effect Of the brain chemical that carries the pleasurable signal, you can loosen the drug's hold.

单选题 According to Dr. Nora Volkow, the use of drugs
[A] is a very harmful behavior that evolution failed to get rid of.
[B] makes it hard for people to drive safely under its influence.
[C] has to do with people's desire to achieve pleasant feelings.
[D] is understandable behavior because it dates back long ago.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解题思路] 事实细节题。文章第一段中间提到Dr. Nora,因此答案要定位在这以后。Nora博士的第二句话说:在我看来,人类将永远会尝试那些让他们感到舒服的东西。由此可见,在博士看来,上瘾与人们获得快乐感觉的欲望有关。
单选题 According to the text, anyone may be addicted to drugs if they
[A] are born with a predisposition to addiction.
[B] use certain chemicals long and frequently enough.
[C] have sufficient drugs or alcohol to use.
[D] create an all consuming pattern of uncontrollable craving.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解题思路] 条件细节题。文章第二段尾句说:由于上瘾涉及这些基本的大脑功能,如果充 分地沉浸于毒品或酒精中,每一个人都可能成为瘾君子。因此,任何人成为瘾君子的条件就是他们“长时间、足够频繁地使用某种化学物质”。
单选题 Compulsive eaters are typical example of
[A] pleasure turning into habits and finally addiction.
[B] obese people with brain hyperactivity.
[C] those who can't control their mouth, lips and tongue.
[D] those who might also be addicted to gambling.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解题思路] 目的细节题。Compulsive eater的例子出现在文章第三段中间部分,而前面正好讲到非化学物质的上瘾问题,然后谈到了行为上瘾,讲到赌博、购物、性都是开始时是习惯,而后沦为上瘾的。而第三段结尾又讲到“任何让人感到快乐的东西都可能导致上瘾”。由此,综合起来,强迫饮食者是典型的把快乐变为习惯最后变为上瘾的例子。
单选题 Paulus could accurately predict the relapsers because
[A] the part of their brain controlling cognitive skills is less active.
[B] a four-week intensive rehabilitation program is not effective enough.
[C] he has the devices sophisticated enough to scan any brain damage.
[D] something innate to their brains prompt them to use drugs.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解题思路] 原因细节题。文章第四段末尾提到Paulus可以准确预测谁会在一年内再次吸毒。其原因在于前面的解释。第四段的主要内容就是:对戒掉毒瘾但一年内又重新吸毒者的大脑扫描成像研究表明他们认知技能较差,不太容易适应新的规则。他们大脑的前额脑皮层(控制理性思维的部分)活跃度较低。证明,能够准确预测的原因在于这些重新吸毒者大脑中控制认知技能的部分活跃度较差。
单选题 We can infer from the passage that we may cure addiction by
[A] scanning of brain as often as possible.
[B] consciously practicing cognitive skills.
[C] going through intensive rehabilitation programs.
[D] making the neurotransmitter less sensitive.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解题思路] 方式细节题。原文最后一段最后一句讲:如果你能减弱大脑中传递快乐信号的化学物质的效果,那么就能摆脱毒品的控制。由此可见,治疗上瘾的办法在于让神经信号传导器不那么敏感。