阅读理解
The Motor Car
There are now over 700 million motor vehicles in the world — and the number is rising by more than 40 million each year. The average distance driven by car users is growing too—from 8 km a day per person in western Europe in 1965 to 25 km a day in 1995.
This dependence on motor vehicles has given rise to major problems, including environmental pollution, depletion of oil resources, traffic congestion and safety.
Problems
While emissions (废气排放) from new cars are far less harmful than they used to be, city streets and motorways are becoming more crowded than ever, often with older trucks, buses and taxis, which emit excessive levels of smoke and fumes. This concentration of vehicles makes air quality in urban areas unpleasant and sometimes dangerous to breathe. Even Moscow has joined the list of capitals suffered form congestion and traffic fumes. In Mexico City, vehicle pollution is a major health hazard.
Until a hundred years ago, most journeys were in the 20 km range, the distance conveniently accessible by horse. Heavy freight could only be carried by water or rail. The invention of the motor vehicle brought personal mobility to the masses and made rapid freight delivery possible over a much wider area. Today about 90 per cent of inland freight in the United Kingdom is carried by road. Clearly the world cannot revert to the horse-drawn wagon. Can it avoid being locked into congested and polluting ways of transporting people and goods?
In Europe most cities are still designed for the old modes of transport. Adaptation to the motor car has involved adding ring roads, one-way systems and parking lots. In the United States, more land is assigned to car use than to housing. The fast development of city life means that life without a car is next to impossible. Mass use of motor vehicles has also killed or injured millions of people. Other social effects have been blamed on the car such as alienation and aggressive human behavior.
A 1993 study by the European Federation for Transport and Environment found that car transport is seven times as costly as rail travel in terms of the external social costs it leads to such as traffic jam, accidents, pollution, loss of crop-land and natural habitats, overuse of oil resources, and so on. Yet cars easily surpass trains or buses as a flexible and convenient mode of personal transport. It is unrealistic to expect people to give up private cars in favor of mass transit.
Solution
Technical solutions can reduce the pollution problem and increase the fuel efficiency of engines. But fuel consumption and exhaust emissions depend on which cars are preferred by customers and how they are driven. Many people buy larger cars than they need for daily purposes or waste fuel by driving aggressively. Besides, global car use is increasing at a faster rate than the improvement in emissions and fuel efficiency which technology is now making possible.
One solution that has been put forward is the long-term solution of designing cities and neighborhoods so that car journeys are not necessary—all essential services being located within walking distance or easily accessible by public transport. Not only would this save energy and cut carbon dioxide emissions, it would also enhance the quality of community life, putting the emphasis on people instead of cars. Good local government is already bringing this about in some places. But few democratic communities are blessed with the vision—and the capital—to make such profound changes in modern lifestyles.
A more practical way to solve the problem seems to be a combination of mass transit systems for travel into and around cities, with small "low emission" cars for urban use and larger hybrid or lean burn cars for use elsewhere. Electronically tolled highways might be used to ensure that drivers pay charges geared to actual road use. Better integration of transport systems is also highly desirable — and made more feasible by modern computers. But there are solutions for countries which can afford them. In most developing countries, old cars and old technologies continue to predominate.
单选题
Vehicle pollution is worse in European cities than anywhere else.
单选题
Transport by horse would be a useful alternative to motor vehicles.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】关键词horse。马或马车可以代替汽车吗?不行。文中第二段说明了在100年前,人们的交通最多集中在方圆20公里内,但现在完全不同。所以Clearly the world cannot revert to the horse-drawn wagon.(世界不可能再回转到使用马车的年代。)故为NO。
单选题
Nowadays freight is not carried by water in the United Kingdom.
【正确答案】
C
【答案解析】关键词water,文中文中第二段只有90 percent of inland freight in the U.K is carried by road.但是并无语段否定水路的使用。所以本题为NOT GIVEN。
单选题
Most European cities were not designed for motor vehicles.
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】关键词European cities,全文通篇在讲交通问题,第三段第一句话陈述了The European cities are still designed for the old modes of transport.说明欧洲的城市规划不是以汽车为主体的,这和美国不同。原文与题干意思一致,为YES。
单选题
Technology alone cannot solve the problem of vehicle pollution.
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】关键词technology,科技能够解决技术上的问题,但是不能解决人的问题,要不要污染,要不要消耗由人来决定。第六段说到Technical solutions can…But…which cars are preferred by customers.故本题为YES。
单选题
People''s choice of car and attitude to driving is a factor in the pollution problem.
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】关键词people''s choice,印证的上一题。同一句话:But fuel consumption and exhaust emissions depend on which cars are preferred by customers and how they are driven.相比可知本题答案为YES。
单选题
Redesigning cities would be a short-term solution.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】关键词redesign,重新规划城市结构到底是不是长久之计?第七段说one solution that has been put forward is the long-term solution of designing cities and neighborhoods so that car journeys are not necessary.计划把一些必须的部门都放到一起,人们就不用再辛苦的到处开车了。与题干表达意思相反,为NO。
问答题
You will feel________ when breathing because of the overwhelming cars in the street.
【正确答案】unpleasant and dangerous
【答案解析】本题旨在考察考生对细节的把握,答案出于第二段人们对城市街道过多汽车会感到unpleasant and dangerous。
问答题
In most cities in Europe, to adapt to the fast development of motor cars would mean to add________, ________ and________.
问答题
According to the author, the most practical way for wealthy countries will be________.
【正确答案】a combination of mass transit systems
【答案解析】本句的关键词为“solution”和“practical”。通过这两个关键词我们可以定位在最后一段。句子中的“wealthy”指的就是“countries which can afford them”,对于这些国家有效的方法就是该句主题句中指出的“a combination of mass transit systems”。