单选题 Austerity is a word much found on the lips of politicians and economists at the moment; but it is seldom heard from technologists. And although the idea that "less is more" has many adherents in architecture, design and fashion, the technology industry has historically held the opposite view. Products should have as many features as possible; and next year's version should have even more. As prices fall, what starts off as a fancy new feature quickly becomes commonplace prompting companies to add new features in an effort to outdo their rivals. Never mind if nobody uses most of these new features. In an arms race, more is always more.
But now there are signs that technologists are waking up to the benefits of minimalism, thanks to two things: feature fatigue among consumers who simply want things to work, and strong demand from less affluent consumers in the developing world. It is telling that the market value of Apple, the company most closely associated with simple, elegant high-tech products, recently overtook that of Microsoft, the company with the most notorious case of new-featuritis. Gadgets are no longer just for geeks, and if technology is to appeal to a broad audience, simplicity trumps fancy specifications.
Another strand of techno-austerity can be found in software that keeps things simple in order to reduce distractions and ensure that computer-users remain focused and productive. Many word processors now have special full-screen modes, so that all unnecessary and distracting menus are disabled or hidden; rather than fiddling with font sizes or checking e-mail, you are encouraged to get on with your writing. A computer on which some features are not present, or have been deliberately disabled, may in fact be more useful if you are trying to get things done. There are no distracting hyperlinks on a typewriter.
And then there is the phenomenon of "frugal" innovation--the new ideas that emerge when trying to reduce the cost of something in order to make it affordable to consumers in places like China, India and Brazil. The resulting products often turn out to have huge appeal in the rich world too, especially in an era of belt-tighten- ing. The netbook, or low-cost laptop, was inspired by a scheme to produce cheap laptops for children in poor countries, but has since proved popular with consumers around the world.
All this offers grounds for hope. If the feature--obsessed technology industry can change its tune, perhaps there is a chance that governments--which have also tended to be habitual believers in the idea that more is more--might also come to appreciate the merits of minimalism.

单选题 In technology industry, products
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】事实细节题。在第1段,作者提到科技产品要不断增加新的功能(Products should have as many features as possible),以在竞争中取胜(prompting companies to add new features in an effort to outdo theirrivals),文中反复出现new和more,故B项正确。A项只说了change,意思不准确。C项意为“通常很一般”,意思刚好相反;D项说价格相对便宜,没有相关信息提到这点。
单选题 We learn from Paragraph 2 that nowadays
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】推理判断题。从第2段的第1句(technologists are waking up to the benefits of minimalism)和最后一句(simplicity trumps fancy specifications)我们得出,技术人员们开始关注产品功能的简约性。从苹果公司以简约产品胜过微软公司,赢得更多消费者的例证,我们也可以判断出极简主义具有的价值。第2段中没有提到与A、C项相关的信息,B项张冠李戴。
单选题 Techno-austerity in software can
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】事实细节题。在第3段中,我们定位到techno-austerity这个词,继续读下去,发现第3段讲的是软件中的技术简约(techno—austerity)能帮助减少工作中的分心(reduce distractions)、提高工作效率(ensure thatcomputer—users remain focused and productive),文中随后给出了一些例子,如special full-screen modes能隐藏menus等功能。因此A项(提高工作效率)正确。B和D意思与文意刚好相反;从文中so that…orhidden看出,techno-austerity是使一些distracting menus变得disabled,而不是去disable software,所以C项错误。
单选题 Which of the following is true of frugal innovation?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】是非判断题。frugal innovation一词出现在第4段中,第4段主要讲述了朴素创新的初衷原是为了降低商品价格,以便让相对贫穷国家的消费者也能买得起产品,但产品同时也受到了富裕国家的欢迎。由此判断D为正确选项。A、C项中的only一词太过绝对,都只包含了一方面;B项说朴素创新对富人没有吸引力,与原意明显不符。
单选题 It can be inferred from the last paragraph that
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】推理判断题。最后一段从技术领域转向政府,最后一句说到,也许政府也能开始认识到极简主义的好处。所以选B。A选项说政府也信仰极简主义,程度过甚,文中用的词是might come to appreciate,即才刚刚开始认识到。文中更多强调的是technology和government在“极简主义”上的相关性,而不是区别,故C不对。D错误,最后一段首句就提到“All this offers grounds for hope.”。