单选题 {{B}}Passage Five{{/B}}
Nanotechnology, according to its fans, will jump-start a new industrial revolution with molecular-sized structures as complex as the human cell and 100 times stronger than steel. The new technology transforms everyday products and the way they are made by manipulating atoms so that materials can be shrunk, strengthened and lightened all at once. To date only modest nanotech-based products--such as stain-resistant fabrics and fresh food packaging--have entered the market, but some scientists predict nanotechnology will eventually be the only game in town. "It will be a ubiquitous technology," said George Stephanopoulos, professor of chemical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He echoes other nanotech supporters who say industrial countries are already sliding toward its use in every aspect of manufacturing.
Aided by recent advances in microscopes, scientists can now place single atoms where they want for the first time. The potential applications are numerous, with microscopic computers, cancer-killing antennae and nonpolluting car engines on the distant horizon. When it's all going to happen, though, is another matter. According to most scientific accounts, the nanotech future may be 10 to 20 years off. Major hurdles need to be jumped. First, there is a lack of economic mass production. Some of the more complicated devices would require exact placement of billions of atoms. "It may take the lifetime of the universe to complete the construction of (such a)device, " said George Barbastathis, assistant professor at NIT. Another challenge is bridging the nanoscale and macroscopic, he said. In other words, the smallness of a nano device is useless when it must be attached to large wires. It's unclear how scientists will overcome these problems. And fears derived from science fiction threaten to derail nano-technology even as it emerges, in much the same way popular anxiety over "super-weeds" and "frankenfoods" have hobbled biotechnology in agriculture and fear of "designer babies" has set back stem-cell research.
Lured by a market with billions of dollars in potential profits, giants like GE, Intel, Motorola and IBM are already heavily involved in research. Worldwide, the two, industries with the potential to win big with nanotechnology are electronics and biotechnology, according to MIT researchers. On the biotech front, scientists are promoting the notion of nanoparticles made from gold that could be triggered remotely to heat and kill individual cancer cells. Nanotechnology holds equal promise for wealth creation, but there isn't a consensus among venture capitalists on how to realize it. "Which direction is it going to work out in? That's the question on everyone's mind," Gang Chen, an associate professor at the MIT, told scientists at a Boston nano gathering.
单选题 The statement "... be the only game... "(line 7, Para. 1) implies that ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 原文中是形容nanotechnology(纳米技术)最终将成为舞台的主角。这可以从以下几句话看出来:To date only...but some scientists predict(虽然现在只有一些产品,但是可以预测……)其深层含义是将来会有很多产品。而且科学家(George Stephanopoulos也说:It will be a ubiquitous technology.(它将变成一门无处不在的技术。)
单选题 Which of the following is NOT the difficulty we face about nanotech research?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 原文第2段提到:需要跨过一些困难的局面。文中列举了第一个:无法在经济上大规模的进行生产;第2个:如何跨接纳米领域和肉眼可见领域;第3个:由科学幻想小说引起的恐惧很可能会威胁到纳米技术。选项A“怎样将纳米技术的寿命延长10到20年”是对原文中the nanotech future may be 10 to 20 years off的误解。
单选题 By mentioning "superweeds, frankenfoods and designer babies " the author means ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 在文章第2段作者讲到纳米技术面对的困难时,作者举了这三个例子来说明以往的某些新兴技术因为公众的偏见而发展受阻,意在指出纳米技术有可能面临同样的问题。D是正确的答案。
单选题 What can we learn from the last paragraph?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 文章最后一段的主要含义是纳米技术会带来巨大的财富,但是对于如何利用纳米技术获得财富大家还在探索阶段。B选项描述,随着纳米技术在医疗领域的应用,癌症会被消灭。文中说,生物工艺学领域正在设想利用纳米技术制造某种装置来杀死癌细胞,因此我们可以推论在将来癌症有可能被消灭。故选B。
单选题 The whole passage is intended to ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 文章第2段和最后一段都说我们在纳米技术的研究上还要努力克服一些障碍,还有方向性的问题没有解决。因此排除B。C告诉读者摆在纳米技术研究面前的障碍。这个表述过于片而,不完整。D揭示了纳米技术领域巨大的商业潜力。和C的缺点一样是不够概括,信息不完整。因此正确的答案是A。