单选题 {{B}}Text 2{{/B}}
Ours is a world in which no individual, and no country, exits in isolation. All of us live simultaneously in our own communities and in the world at large. The same icons, whether on a movie screen or computer screen, are recognizable from Berlin to Bangalore. We are all influenced by the same tides of political, social and technological change. Pollution, organized crime and tile proliferation of deadly weapons likewise show little regard for the niceties of borders; they are "problems without passports". We are connected, wired, interdependent.
Much of this is nothing new — human beings have interacted across the planet for centuries. But today's "globalization" is different. It is happening more rapidly. And it is governed by different rules or, in some cases, by no rules at all. Globalization is bringing us new choices and opportunities. It is making us more familiar with global diversity. Yet, millions of people experience it not as an agent of progress, but as a disruptive force that can destroy lives, jobs and traditions.
Faced with the potential good of globalization as well as its risks, faced with the persistence of deadly conflicts in which civilians are the primary targets, faced with the pervasiveness of poverty and injustice, we must be able to identify the areas where collective action is needed to safeguard global interests. Local communities have their fire departments and town councils. Nations have their courts and legislatures. But in today's globalized world, the mechanisms available for global action are hardly more than {{U}}embryonic{{/U}}. It is high time we gave more concrete meaning to the idea of the "international community".
What makes a community? What binds it together? For some it is faith. For others it is the defense of an idea, such as democracy. Some communities are homogeneous, others multicultural. Some are as small as schools and villages; others as large as continents. Specifically, what binds us into an international community? In the broadest sense there is a shared vision of a better world for all people, as set out, for example, in the founding Charter of the United Nations. There is our sense of common vulnerability in the face of global warming and the spread of weapons of mass destruction. There is the framework of international law, treaties and human-rights conventions. There is equally our sense of shared opportunity, which is why we build common markets and joint institutions such as the United Nations. Together, we are stronger.
单选题 The writer's general attitude towards the world is that ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】分析推理题。文章第一段作者首先指出在世界上没有个人、国家是孤立存在的,然后列举了一些现象,说明了个人、国家之间的相互关联和相互影响,而在第二段又提到全球化使得这种关联和影响变得更广泛。由此可知[B]对。
单选题 What does the author say about globalization today?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】细节题。第二段倒数第二句说:It is... with global diversity,即全球化让人们更加了解全球多样化,也即各国之间的差异([B]);该段最后一句又说:... but as a disruptive force that can destroy lives, jobs and traditions,即作者同时认为全球化会破坏人们的生活、职业和传统([C])。因此本题答案应选[D]。
单选题 Why do we build common markets and joint institutions?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】细节题。答案信息对应于文章倒数第二句话:There is equally our sense... such as the United Nations,即我们建立共同市场和联合机构的原因是为了平等地分享新的选择和机会,答案是[C]。
单选题 The word "embryonic" in paragraph 3 means ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】词义推测题。该词所在句前面说的是地方和各国有各种各样的法律和社会体系,而这一句用 but转折,指出在如今的全球化世界,用于采取全球化行动的机制还仅仅是______。由句意与常识可知,embryonic应当指“不够”或者“不完善”等义,因此选[A]。事实上,由构词法完全可推知答案;embryo是大纲词,指“胚胎”,而-nic是形容词后缀,由此可知embryonic应当喻指“处于萌芽状态的”。
单选题 Which of the following best summarises the text?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】主旨题。文章首先指出全球化的现实和表现(第一段),然后指出全球化给人们生活等带来的影响(第二段),最后两段则说明了采取全球共同行动的原因和必要性。而作者的重心放在后面两段,即全球化要求我们采取全球性的行动(以保护世界的共同利益),故最能概括文章主旨的选项是[A]。[B]、[C]两项只是文章中的部分词句,而[D]中的good and risks不是文章的重点。