Everyone must have had at least one personal experience with a computer
error by this time. Bank balances are suddenly reported to have jumped from $379
into the millions, appeals for charitable contributions are mailed over and over
to people with crazy sounding names at your address, department stores send the
wrong bills, utility companies write that they're turning everything off, that
sort of thing. If you manage to get in touch with someone and complain, you then
get instantaneously typed, guilty letters from the same computer, saying, "Our
computer was in error, and an adjustment is being made in your
account." These are supposed to be the sheerest, blindest
accidents. Mistakes are not believed to be the normal behavior of a good
machine. If things go wrong, it must be a personal, human error, the result of
fingering, tampering a button getting stuck, someone hitting the wrong key. The
computer, at its normal best, is infallible. I wonder whether
this can be true. After all, the whole point of computers is that they represent
an extension of the human brain, vastly improved upon but nonetheless human,
superhuman maybe. A good computer can think clearly and quickly enough to beat
you at chess, and some of them have even been programmed to write obscure verse.
They can do anything we can do, and more besides. It is not yet
known whether a computer has its own consciousness, and it would be hard to find
out about this. When you walk into one of those great halls now built for the
huge machines, and standing listening, it is easy to imagine that the faint,
distant noises are the sound of thinking, and the turning of the spools gives
them the look of wild creatures rolling their eyes in the effort to concentrate,
choking with information. But real thinking, and dreaming, are other matters. On
the other hand, the evidence of something like an unconscious, equivalent to
ours, are all around, in every mail. As extensions of the human brain, they have
been constructed the same property of error, spontaneous, uncontrolled, and rich
in possibilities.
单选题
The title of the writing "To Err Is Human" implies that
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】[分析] 主旨题型。
答案出自文章中第二段的第三句If things go wrong, it must be a personal, human error...,人类犯错总是不可避免的。
单选题
The first paragraph implies that
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】[分析] 推断题型。
第一句Everyone must have had at least one personal experience with a computer error by this time。是这段的主题句,下面详述了电脑操作中出现的错随处可见,因此,电脑错误是防不胜防的。
单选题
The author uses his hypothesis that "computers represent an extension of the human brain" in order to indicate that
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】[分析] 细节题型。
根据末段的最后一句话As extensions of the human brain, they have been constructed the same property of error, spontaneous, uncontrolled, and rich in possibilities. (电脑作为人脑的衍生物具有人类犯错、自觉的、自由的和丰富的潜力等特点。)所以,人和电脑犯错都是不可避免的。
单选题
The rhetoric the author employed in writing the third paragraph, especially the sentence "A good computer can think clearly and quickly enough to beat you at chess..." is usually referred to in writing as
单选题
The author compared the faint and distant sound of the computer to the sound of thinking and regarded it as the product of
【正确答案】
C
【答案解析】[分析] 细节题型。
答案出自第四段第二、四句...it is easy to imagine that the faint, distant noises are the sound of thinking... On the other hand, the evidence of something like an unconscious, equivalent to ours, are all around...。