单选题 What is the role of human resources as the world goes through turmoil, and what is its future as so many industries face extreme change?

Effendi Ibnoe,
Bali, Indonesia


Talk about timing. Your question arrived in our in-box the same day that we received a note from an acquaintance who had just been let go from his job in publishing, certainly one of the industries that is facing, as you put it, "extreme change". He described his layoff as a practically Orwellian experience in which he was ushered into a conference room to meet with an outplacement consultant who, after dispensing with logistics, informed him that she would call him at home that evening to make sure everything was all right.
"I assured her I had friends and loved ones and a dog," he wrote, "and since my relationship with her could be measured in terms of seconds, they could take care of that end of things." "Memo to HR: Instead of saddling dismissed employees with solicitous outplacement reps," he noted wryly, "put them in a room with some crockery for a few therapeutic minutes of smashing things against a wall."
While we enjoy our friend"s sense of humor, we"d suggest a different memo to HR. "Layoffs are your moment of truth," it would say, "when your company must show departing employees the same kind of attentiveness and dignity that was showered upon them when they entered. Layoffs are when HR proves its mettle and its worth, demonstrating whether a company really cares about its people."
Look, we"ve written before about HR and the game-changing role we believe it can—and should—play as the engine of an organization"s hiring, appraisal, and development processes. We"ve asserted that too many companies relegate HR to the mundane busy-work of newsletters, picnics, and benefits, and we"ve made the case that every CEO should elevate his head of HR to the same stature as the CFO. But if there was ever a time to underscore the importance of HR, it has arrived. And, sadly, if there was ever a time to see how few companies get HR right, it has arrived, too, as our acquaintance"s experience shows.
So, to your question: What is HR"s correct role now—especially in terms of layoffs?
First, HR has to make sure people are let go by their managers, not strangers. Being fired is dehumanizing in any event, but to get the news from a "hired gun" only makes matters worse. That"s why HR must ensure that managers accept their duty, which is to be in on the one conversation at work that must be personal. Pink slips should be delivered face-to-face, eyeball-to-eyeball.
Second, HR"s role is to serve as the company"s arbiter of equity. Nothing raises hackles more during a layoff than the sense that some people—namely the loudmouths and the litigious—are getting better deals than others. HR can mitigate that dynamic by making sure across units and divisions that severance arrangements, if they exist, are appropriate and evenhanded. You simply don"t want people to leave feeling as if they got you-know-what. They need to walk out saying: "At least I know I was treated fairly."
Finally, HR"s role is to absorb pain. In the hours and days after being let go, people need to vent, and it is HR"s job to be completely available to console. At some point, an outplacement consultant can come into the mix to assist with a transition, but HR can never let "the departed" feel as if they"ve been sent to a leper colony. Someone connected to each let-go employee—either a colleague or HR staffer—should check in regularly. And not just to ask, "Is everything O.K.?" but to listen to the answer with an open heart, and when appropriate, offer to serve as a reference to prospective employers.
Three years ago, we wrote a column called, "So Many CEOs Get This Wrong", and while many letters supported our stance that too many companies undervalue HR, a significant minority pooh-poohed HR as irrelevant to the "real work" of business. Given the state of things, we wonder how those same HR-minimalists feel now. If their company is in crisis—or their own career—perhaps at last they"ve seen the light. HR matters enormously in good times. It defines you in the bad.
单选题 Why does the author say that his friend"s note displayed a "sense of humor" (para. 3)?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 根据上下文正确理解句子和短语的能力。第一、二两段讲述了作者的朋友在被公司解雇时的遭遇,该朋友还颇具讽刺意味地向人力资源官员提出了在解雇员工时的备忘录。他的幽默之处在于,在自己被解雇之时,还向有关官员提出应怎样对待被解雇员工的建议,选项C正确。作者描写其被解雇的经历并非为体现extreme change,排除选项A;选项B和D描述的内容和他的幽默感并没有明确联系,予以排除。
单选题 The expression "moment of truth" in the sentence "Layoffs are your moment of truth ... when they entered" (para. 3) most probably means ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 根据上下文正确理解句子和短语的能力。第三段中作者设计了给人力资源部门官员的另一个memo,指出公司解聘员工时正是证明其本领、能力和价值的时刻,选项A正确;选项B(解雇员工的时刻),选项C(说实话的重要时刻),选项D(丧失尊严的时刻),均不符合题意,应予排除。
单选题 Which of the following does NOT support the author"s statement that "HR has to make sure people are let go by their managers, not strangers" (para. 6)?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 根据上下文正确理解句子的能力。文中作者提出,在雇员意识到自己是被经理、而不是被strangers解雇时,被解雇者会感到自己得到了较为人道的对待和尊重。这一过程中人力资源官员也起到了正面的作用。选项A,B和C都是对作者观点的正面解释;选项D意思正相反,符合题意,应予排除,为答案。
单选题 The expression "pink slips" in the sentence "Pink slips should be delivered face-to-face, eyeball-to-eyeball" (para. 6) can best be paraphrased as ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 根据上下文正确理解句子和短语的能力。本文主题即探讨员工被解雇时应得到怎样的对待这一问题,文中多次使用相应词语。本段中就有另两个短语are let go by和being fired指向解雇事宜,pink slip即解雇通知书,此义可从上下文作出推断,选项B正确。选项A,C和D与该话题并无关联,予以排除。
单选题 Which of the following expresses the main idea of the passage?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 对文章主旨大意的归纳能力。纵观全文,作者通过举例说明提出了公司中人力资源部门的重要作用,这作用尤其体现在员工遭解雇之时,公司应让员工感受到,无论自己是否在职,他们都受到一样的尊重。选项C体现了这样的主旨。选项A的说法内容本身可接受,但概括不全面。选项B的概括走向另一极端。选项D的说法和文中提倡的做法唱反调,也应排除。