Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return? Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December. This near tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock, when prices quadrupled, and 1979-1980, when they also almost tripled. Both previous shocks resulted in double-digit inflation and global economic decline. So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time? The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports. Strengthening economic growth, at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere, could push the price higher still in the short tern. Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s. In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the 1970s. In Europe, taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price, so even quite big changes in the price of crude have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past. Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were, and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price. Energy conservation, a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy intensive industries have reduced oil consumption. Software, consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production. For each dollar of GDP (in constant prices), rich economies now use nearly 50% less oil than in 1973.The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that, if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year, compared with $13 in 1998, this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by Only 0.25~0.5 % of GDP. That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980. On the other hand, oil-importing emerging economies—to which heavy industry has shifted—have become more energy-intensive, and so could be more seriously squeezed. One more reason, not to lose sleepover. The rise in oil prices is that, unlike the rises in the 1970s, it has not occurred against the background of general commodity price inflation and global excess demand. A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline. The Economist"s commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago. In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70%, and in 1979 by almost 30%.
单选题 The main reason for the latest rise of oil price is______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:细节题。作者在第一段提到自从欧佩克在3月决定减少原油供应,油价就上涨了以及第二段中又提到由于伊拉克暂停石油出口,使油价进一步上涨。不难看出主要原因应是B。
单选题 It can be inferred from the text that the retail price of petrol will go up dramatically if______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:推理题。作者在第三段末句中提到,多数国家原油价格只占汽油价格的一小部分,而税收却占了五分之四。由此可以推断要使汽油价格大幅度上涨,就只能使税收上涨,答案为D。
单选题 The estimates in Economic Outlook show that in rich countries______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:细节题。作者在第四段中提到如果油价与1998年的13美元每桶相比,连续一年价格都维持在22美元每桶的话,这也只会使发达国家的石油进出口支出在GDP中所占的比例增加 0.25~0.5个百分点,可见油价的上涨也并没有对这些发达国家的GDP有什么重大影响,因此答案为D。
单选题 We can draw a conclusion from the text that______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:推断题。本文中作者在第一、二两段均提到油价上涨,而在接下来的三段中用大量事实表明如今的油价上涨并不会给经济带来太大影响,那么看来油价上涨带来的恐慌已经没有过去那么严重了。因此答案为A。
单选题 From the text we can see that the writer seems______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:作者观点题。文中总体讲述油价上涨并没有给人们带来多大的恐慌,可见作者是抱以乐观态度,所以答案为A。