Another milestone on the journey towards digital cash was passed on November 13th. That date marked the emergence from beta-testing in America of V. me, a "digital wallet" that holds multiple payment cards in a virtual repository. Instead of providing their personal details and card numbers to pay for stuff online, customers just enter a username and a password. The service is provided by Visa, a giant card-payment network whose headquarters is in the heart of Silicon Valley, close to a host of technology firms which would love to get their hands on a chunk of the global payments business. In the short term new technology is actually boosting usage of plastic. Smartphone apps often require users to enter their card details to pay for services. Firms such as Square and PayPal have developed tiny card readers that plug into smartphones and allow small traders using their software to accept payments cheaply. Ed McLaughlin, who oversees emerging payments technologies at MasterCard, reckons such developments have added 1. 2m new businesses over the past 12 months to the card firms' list of merchants. But even if plastic cards eventually go the way of vinyl records, card networks should still prosper because they too are investing heavily in new technology and have several built-in advantages. Visa is betting its member banks can help it to narrow the gap with rivals like PayPal, for instance, which is part of eBay and has grown to 117m active users thanks in part to its use on the auction site. Over 50 financial institutions are supporting the launch of V. me, which accepts non-Visa cards in its wallet, too. MasterCard and others are also touting digital wallets, some of which can hold digital coupons and tickets as well as card details. Before long all of these wallets are likely to end up on mobile phones, which can be used to buy things in stores and other places. This is where firms such as Square, which has developed its own elegant and easy-to-use mobile wallet, and Google have been focusing plenty of energy. Jennifer Schulz, Visa's global head of e-commerce, predicts there will be a shake-out that leaves only a few wallet providers standing. Thanks to their trusted brands, big budgets and payments savvy, one or more card companies will be among them. Card networks are also taking stakes in innovative firms to keep an eye on potentially disruptive technologies. Visa owns part of Square, which recently struck a deal with Starbucks to make its mobile-payment service available in 7,000 of the coffee chain's outlets in America. Visa has also invested in Monitise, a mobile-banking specialist. American Express, for its part, has set up a $100m digital-commerce fund, one of whose investments is in iZettle, a Square-like firm based in Sweden. So far few have tried to create new payments systems from scratch. Those that have toyed with the idea, such as ISIS, a consortium of telecoms companies in America, have concluded it is far too costly and painful to deal with regulators, set up anti-fraud systems and so forth. Fears about the security of new-fangled payment systems also play into the hands of established card firms. Still, they cannot relax. Bryan Keane, an analyst at Deutsche Bank, points out that rival digital wallets could promote alternatives to credit and debit cards, including stored-value cards and direct bank-account-to-bank-account payments. Big retailers in America have clubbed together to create their own digital wallet and are likely to prompt users to choose the payment options that are cheapest for the chains, by offering them incentives like coupons. Jack Dorsey, the boss of Square and a co-founder of Twitter, agrees that digital wallets will make the trade-offs between various payment options clearer to consumers and reckons this will force card networks to up their game. "They had a major innovation 60 years ago" he says, "and there have been very, very few innovations since. " Some in the payments world might quibble with that but one thing they can all agree on is that the spread of mobile payments will bring many more customers. MasterCard's Mr. McLaughlin claims that 85% of commerce still involves cash and cheques. As mobile purchases take off, more of this activity will move online. The biggest prize of all lies in emerging markets, where a lack of financial infrastructure is hastening the rise of phone-based payments systems such as M-Pesa, which serves Kenya and several other markets. Visa has snapped up Fundamo, which specialises in payment services for the unbanked and underbanked in emerging markets; MasterCard has set up a joint venture called Wanda with Telef6nica, a Spanish telecoms firm, which aims to boost mobile payments across Latin America. The payments world is changing fast but the card firms are not about to let rivals swipe their business.
单选题 Which of the following is NOT a feature of "digital wallet"? (Paragraph One)
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:细节题。第一段第四句指出,电子钱包业务由维萨公司提供,但该段并未表述维萨是该业务的唯一供应商。根据第三段最后一句可知,诸如万事达等其他公司也在兜售电子钱包,[D]过于绝对,与文意不符,故为正确答案。根据第一段第二句可知,在电子钱包面世之前,美国已经向发达国家发布了测试版的电子钱包——V.me,而如今的电子钱包集多种支付卡功能于一身,[A]和[B]符合文意,故排除;根据第一段第三句可知,电子钱包面世后,网上支付只需输入用户名和密码,不再需要提供卡号和个人信息,[C]符合文意,故排除。
单选题 What can be inferred from the prediction of Jennifer Schulz?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:推断题。根据第四段第三、四句可知,珍妮弗.舒尔茨预测,市场将迎来一次大洗牌,之后仅会有几家电子钱包供应商胜出,一家或多家支付卡公司将在其中。由此可推测,未来市场将是电子钱包和支付卡公司并存的混合型市场,[A]符合文意,故为正确答案。文中并未指出混合型市场中哪类公司占主导地位,故排除[B];根据珍妮弗.舒尔茨的预测,支付卡公司最终在市场上仍有立足之地,但并不能推测其最终是否会被替代,故排除[C];该段第一句指出,手机钱包有可能最终出现在移动电话上,它可以用来购买商店里或其他地方的物品。这彰显了其卓越的便利功能,但并不能由此推测移动手机钱包在市场上立足的原因仅限于此,[D]过于绝对,故排除。
单选题 What conclusion can be drawn from the description of ISIS?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:推断题。根据第六段第三句可知,人们对新式支付系统安全性的担忧正中当今支付卡公司的下怀。又通过第七段第一句可知,尽管支付卡公司因此得益,但他们并不能放松。由此可推断支付卡公司的确从伊希斯财团创建新支付系统的失败中得利,但由于数字钱包的发展势头强劲而不敢有丝毫松懈,所以他们的得利是暂时的,[A]符合文意,故为正确答案。通过第六段第二句可知,成本昂贵、难以处理与监管机构的关系以及建立反欺诈系统障碍重重是伊希斯财团失败的直接原因,不是由伊希斯事件得出的结论,故排除[B]和[C];通过第七段第二句可知,数字钱包的迅猛发展加速了各种支付卡的更新换代,这与伊希斯财团的失利无直接的因果关系,故排除[D]。
单选题 Which of the following best explains the competition between digital wallet and payment card?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:推断题。根据第九段最后一句可知,虽然支付界变幻莫测,但支付卡公司并不打算将自己的业务拱手相让,同时根据第九段第一、二句可知,在一些经济相对落后的新兴市场,移动支付业务已经迅速崛起,由此可推测,在未来移动业务将覆盖全球,但支付卡公司仍会力争市场份额,[D]符合文意,故为正确答案。根据第八段第四、五句可知,虽然现阶段大多数商业活动仍然涉及现金和支票,但随着移动购买业务的飙升,更多的这类商业活动将依托网络为载体运营。由此可推测未来支付卡的市场地位将会动摇,故排除[A];根据第九段第一、二句可知,由于新兴市场缺乏金融基础设施,所以基于手机的支付系统如“移动钱包”在肯尼亚等地迅速崛起,但其并不代表世界范围内的情况都与肯尼亚等地的新兴市场类似,故排除[B];同样根据这两句可知,合资企业的成立适应了拉丁美洲等新兴市场的需求,并不能由此推测其也适应于世界其他地区,故排除[C]。