单选题 Americans no longer expect public figures, whether in speech or in writing, to command the English language with skill and gift. Nor do they aspire to such command themselves. In his latest book, Doing Our Own Thing, The Degradation of Language and Music and Why We Should, Like, Care, John Mc Whorter, a linguist and controversialist of mixed liberal and conservative views, see the triumph of 1960s counter-culture as responsible for the decline of formal English.
Blaming the permissive 1960s is nothing new, but this is not yet another criticism against the decline in education. Mr. McWhorter"s academic speciality is language history and change, and he sees the gradual disappearance of "whom", for example, to be natural and no more regrettable than the loss of the case-endings of Old English.
But the cult of the authentic and the personal, "doing our own thing", has spelt the death of formal speech, writing, poetry and music. While even the modestly educated sought an elevated tone when they put pen to paper before the 1960s, even the most well regarded writing since then has sought to capture spoken English on the page. Equally, in poetry, the highly personal genre is the only form that could claim real liveliness. In both oral and written English, talking is triumphing over speaking, spontaneity over craft.
Illustrated with an entertaining array of examples from both high and low culture, the trend that Mr. McWhorter documents is unmistakable. But it is less clear, to take the question of his subtitle: Why We Should, Like, Care. As a linguist, he acknowledges that all varieties of human language, including nonstandard ones like Black English, can be powerfully expressive—there exists no language or dialect in the world that cannot convey complex ideas. He is not arguing, as many do, that we can no longer think straight because we do not talk proper.
Russians have a deep love for their own language and carry chunks of memorized poetry in their heads, while Italian politicians tend to elaborate speech that would seem old-fashioned to most English speakers. Mr. McWhorter acknowledges that formal language is not strictly necessary, and proposes no radical educational reforms—he is really grieving over the loss of something beautiful more than useful. We now take our English on "paper plates instead of china". A shame, perhaps, but probably an inevitable one.
单选题 According to McWhorter, the decline of formal English ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 本题可参照文章的第1段。从中可知,John McWhoiter是一位语言学家,也是一位掺杂自由和保守观点的有争议人物。在其最近出版的书中,他认为,20世纪60年代反文化的胜利应该对正式英语的衰退负责任。McWhorter先生的研究方向是语言的历史和演变,比如,他认为,whom一词的逐渐消失是很自然的事情,同古代英语中格的消失一样并不令人遗憾。据此可知,McWhorter认为正式英语的衰退是非常自然的现象。B项与McWhorter的观点相符。因此B项为正确答案。
单选题 The word "talking" (Line 5, Para. 3) denotes ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本题可参照文章的第3段。从中可知,20世纪60年代以前,那些受过适当教育的人在动笔写东西时都在寻求高雅的语调,但那以后,连那些最受尊敬的写作都寻求应用口头英语。同样,在诗歌中,只有高度个性化的诗歌类型才可以称得上真正具有活力的诗歌。在口头和书面英语中,随意言谈胜过正式演说,自发性胜过技巧。据此可知,该单词的意思是“随意言谈”。D项与文章的意思相符。因此D项为正确答案。
单选题 To which of the following statements would McWhorter most likely agree?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题可参照文章的文章第4段。从中可知,通过大量来自于高雅和粗俗文化的有趣例子,McWhorter先生证实的趋势一目了然。但是,对其新书副标题中的问题——我们为什么应当喜欢和在乎,则不那么清楚。作为一名语言学家,他认为,所有类型的人类语言,包括像黑人英语那样的不标准语言,都可以极具表现力——世界上还不存在不能表达复杂思想的语言或方言。如许多人一样,他不是在争论,说因为无法恰当地交谈,而使我们不能有条理地思考。据此可知,McWhorter认为,人们的思维方式与人们的交谈方式没有多大关系。A项与文章的意思相符。因此A项为正确答案。
单选题 The description of Russians" love of memorizing poetry shows the author"s ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 本题可参照文章的最后一段。从中可知,俄罗斯人深爱他们自己的语言,他们的脑海中记录着大量诗歌,而意大利的政客们往往向大多数讲英语者详细阐述他们似乎老掉牙的演说。据此可知,作者钦佩俄罗斯人的努力。B项与文章的意思相符。因此B项为正确答案。
单选题 According to the last paragraph, "paper plates" to "china" is as ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 从文章的最后一段可知,McWhorter先生认为,正式语言不是确实需要的,他没有建议进行激进的教育改革——他确实在为失去某些美好而非有用的东西感到悲伤。我们现在把英语放在“纸盘而不是瓷盘”上。也许这是一种遗憾,但是一种无法避免的遗憾。据此可知,把“纸盘子”与“瓷器”相比是在比较美观和用途。C项与文章的意思相符。因此C项为正确答案。