单选题
下面的短文有15处空白,请根据短文内容为每处空白确定1个最佳选项。
Once-daily Pill Could Simplify HIV Treatment

Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead Sciences have combined many HIV drugs into a single pill. Sometimes the best medicine is more than one kind of medicine. Malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/ AIDS, for example, are all treated with {{U}}(51) {{/U}} of drugs. But that can mean a lot of pills to take. It would be {{U}}(52) {{/U}} if drug companies combined all the medicines into a single pill, taken just once a day.
Now, two companies say they have done that for people just {{U}}(53) {{/U}} treatment for HIV, the virus, that causes AIDS. The companies are Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead Sciences. They have {{U}}(54) {{/U}} a single pill that combines three drugs currently on the market. Bristol-Myes Squibb sells one of them {{U}}(55) {{/U}} the name of Sustiva. Gilead combined the {{U}}(56) {{/U}}, Emtriva and Viread, into a single pill in two thousand four.
Combining drugs involves more than {{U}}(57) {{/U}} issues. It also involves issues of competition {{U}}(58) {{/U}} the drugs are made by different companies. The new once-daily pill is the result of {{U}}(59) {{/U}} is described as the first joint venture agreement of its kind in the treatment of HIV.
In January the New England Journal of Medicine published a study of the new pill. Researchers compared its {{U}}(60) {{/U}} to that of the widely used combination of Sustiva and Combivir. Combivir {{U}}(61) {{/U}} two drugs, AZT and 3TC. The researchers say that after one year of treatment, the new pill suppressed HIV levels in more patients and with {{U}}(62) {{/U}} side effects. Gilead paid for the study. Professor Joel Gallant at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland, led the research.
Glaxo Smith Kine reacted {{U}}(63) {{/U}} the findings by saying that a single study is of limited value. It says the effectiveness of Combivir has been shown in each of more than fifty studies.
The price of the new once-daily pill has not been announced. But Gilead and Bristol-Myers Squibb say they will provide it at reduced cost to developing countries. They plan in the next few months to ask the United States Food and Drug Administration to {{U}}(64) {{/U}} the new pill.
There are limits to who could take it because of the different drugs it contains. For example, {{U}}(65) {{/U}} women are told not to take Sustiva because of the risk of birth disorders. Experts say more that forty million people around the world are living with HIV.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本段中多处提到新药是由几种药合成在一起的,而原来则需要服用多种药物,本空白处四个选项中只有C项“组合物,结合体”是唯一恰当的选择。
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本篇文章的标题就提示了本空白处的正确选项。
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 这两家研制新药的公司让谁服用这些新药呢?只有A项“开始治疗”的人才有意义,其他三项均表示不再治疗,故予以排除。而且副词just(“刚刚”)也起着帮助选 择的作用。
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 这两家公司将目前市场销售的三种药物合成一片,这只能是“开发,研发”(D项),绝不可能是“分析”、“检查”或“探查”。
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 这几个介词中,只有under可以与name组合成短词under the name of (“以……为名”),其他选项在这里均不合适。
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 上面两家公司已经开发出将多种药合成为单片的新药,Bristol-Myers公司已合成了一种,Gilead公司则于2004年将其他两种Emtriva和Viread合成为单片,这里既然列出了这两种药的名称,所以就必须用others。
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 合成药物让人们首先想到的自然是“技术”问题,但不仅仅是技术问题,所以下面就提到竞争问题。
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 竞争问题只有当不同药厂制造同一类药品时才会出现,所以只有if才合适。
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本句中,the result of后面应该是一个宾语从句的,比较后应该用what恰当,因为这里指的是具体这一次,而不是泛指任何一次。
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 研究人员对不同药物进行对比,自然是对比它们的疗效,其他三个选项的对比均毫无意义。
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 四个选项中只有A和B可以考虑,exclude意为“除外,排除”,与contain (“包含,含有”)正相反,因此,即使是不知道AZT和3TC可以治疗艾滋病也会选择B项,因为作者绝不会在没有说明AZT和3TC是什么样的药物的情况下就说不包含它们,如果这样说就会让读者摸不着头脑。
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 既然这种新药可以抑制更多病人的HIV水平,副作用自然应该“更少”,这是使用新药前后的对比,故必须用比较级。
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] react…to(“对……作出反应”)是固定用法,其他选项均不对。
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 从本句字面上看,他们打算在未来几个月内要求FDA干什么事情呢?而且是与新药有关,而FDA又是审批药品的机关,自然是approve(“批准”)了。
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本句后面已经提到,生育时可能有危险,那就只有孕妇(pregnant women)才涉及的问题了。