单选题 Texting has long been lamented as the downfall of the written word, "penmanship for illiterates," as one critic called it. To which the proper response is LOL. Texting properly isn't writing at all—it's actually more similar to spoken language. And it's a "spoken" language that is getting richer and more complex by the year. Historically, talking came first; writing is just an artifice that came along later. While talk is largely subconscious and rapid, writing is deliberate and slow. Over time, writers took advantage of this and started crafting sentences such as this one, from The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire: "The whole engagement lasted above 12 hours, till the gradual retreat of the Persians was changed into a disorderly flight, of which the shameful example was given by the principal leaders and the Surenas himself." No one talks like that casually—or should. But it is natural to desire to do so for special occasions. In the old days, we didn't much write like talking because there was no mechanism to reproduce the speed of conversation. But texting and instant messaging do—and a revolution has begun. It involves the basic mechanics of writing, but in its economy, spontaneity and even vulgarity, texting is actually a new kind of talking. There is a virtual fashion of concision and little interest in capitalization or punctuation. The argument that texting is "poor writing" is analogous, then, to one that the Rolling Stones is "bad music" because it doesn't use violas. Texting is developing its own kind of grammar. Take LOL. It doesn't actually mean "laughing out loud" in a literal sense anymore. LOL has evolved into something much subtler and sophisticated and is used even when nothing is remotely amusing. Jocelyn texts "Where have you been?" and Annabelle texts back "LOL at the library studying for two hours." LOL signals basic empathy between texters, easing tension and creating a sense of equality. Instead of having a literal meaning, it does something—conveying an attitude—just like the "-ed" ending conveys past tense rather than "meaning" anything. LOL, of all things, is grammar. Civilization is fine—people banging away on their smartphones are fluently using a code separate from the one they use in actual writing, and there is no evidence that texting is ruining composition skills. Worldwide people speak differently from the way they write, and texting—quick, casual and only intended to be read once—is actually a way of talking with your fingers.
单选题 "Penmanship for illiterates" (Para, 1) suggests that_____.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:根据题目可直接定位到第一段。文章以大众对发短信的看法开头,①句指出发短信息被看作书面语的衰落(downfall of the written word),接着在③句提出自己的观点:发短信息不是写作,短信更接近于口头语言。A项中的degradation与原文中的downfall为同义替换,故A项为正确答案。
单选题 It can be learned that writing _____.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:根据题干中的关键词writing以及选项里将其与说话进行的比较,可以将范围缩小至第二段及第三段。第二段②句表明,写作是deliberate“审慎的”,C项中的carefully-worded正是对该词的同义转述;此外,第三段①句讲到,No one talks like that casually“若非在正式场合当中,人们不会那样说话”,that指代第二段讲的作家写作时炮制的长句,此处反过来说明写作是非casually的,即正式的,因此C项为正确答案。
单选题 The Rolling Stones is cited in Paragraph 3 to _____.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:根据题干可直接定位到第三段,根据题干中的Rolling Stones可以把范围缩小到该段最后一句。此处考查了对be analogous to这一短语的理解。analogous是analogy的派生词,不难推测出该短语意为“与……类似”,即滚石音乐的例子与前面那种认为短信交流是“拙劣的写作”的言论相似。“滚石不用中提琴就是‘糟糕的音乐’”,这是不合逻辑的,原文用此来与“短信息是拙劣的写作”进行类比,说明这样评论短信交流也是不合逻辑的,因此C项为正确答案。
单选题 We may learn from the text that texting is _____.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:第一段③句作者表达了他对texting的看法,认为短信根本不是写作(isn’t…at all),更接近口头语言 (more similar to…),最后一段作者也把短信息归纳为一种用手指说话的方式,因此D项为正确答案。
单选题 The author's attitude toward texting is one of_____.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:作者对于短信交流的态度体现在几个地方:第一段中作者对有关发短信的指责毫不在意,第三段认为发短信是受人欢迎的、变革性的新说话方式,以及最后一段表明文明发展很美好且没有证据表明发短信会毁掉我们的写作技能。作者整体表现出积极肯定的态度,因此B项为正确答案。观点判断类题常需要我们结合整篇文章的前后语义作综合判断,切勿只因个别语句而匆忙下结论。