The percentage of immigrants (including those unlawfully present) in the United States has been creeping upward for years. At 12.6 percent, it is now higher than at any point since the mid-1920s. We are not about to go back to the days when Congress openly worried about inferior races polluting America's bloodstream. But once again we are wondering whether we have too many of the wrong sort of newcomers. Their loudest critics argue that the new wave of immigrants cannot, and indeed do not want to, fit in as previous generations did. We now know that these racist views were wrong. In time, Italians, Romanians and members of other so-called inferior races became exemplary Americans and contributed greatly, in ways too numerous to detail, to the building of this magnificent nation. There is no reason why these new immigrants should not have the same success. Although children of Mexican immigrants do better, in terms of educational and professional attainment, than their parents, UCLA sociologist Edward Telles has found that the gains don't continue. Indeed, the fourth generation is marginally worse off than the third. James Jackson, of the University of Michigan, has found a similar trend among black Caribbean immigrants, Telles fears that Mexican-Americans may be fated to follow in the footsteps of American blacks—that large parts of the community may become mired (陷入) in a seemingly permanent state of poverty and underachievement. Like African-Americans, Mexican-Americans are increasingly relegated to(降入) segregated(隔离) , substandard schools, and their dropout rate is the highest for any ethnic group in the country. We have learned much about the foolish idea of excluding people on the presumption of the ethnic/racial inferiority. But what we have not yet learned is how to make the process of Americanization work for all. I am not talking about requiring people to learn English or to adopt American ways; those things happen pretty much on their own. But as arguments about immigration heat up the campaign trail, we also ought to ask some broader questions about assimilation (同化), about how to ensure that people, once outsiders, don't forever remain marginalized within these shores. That is a much larger question than what should happen with undocumented workers, or how best to secure the border, and it is one that affects not only newcomers but groups that have been here for generations. It will have more impact on our future than where we decide to set the admissions bar for the latest wave of would-be Americans. And it would be nice if we finally got the answer right.
单选题 How were immigrants viewed by U. S. Congress in early days?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:细节题。第二段首句提到,我们不打算回到国会认为劣等民族会污染美国血统的日子。结合首段首句的immigrants可知,这句话中的inferior races指的正是移民,由此可知,以前国会认为移民是劣等民族,故A项为正确答案。
单选题 What does the author think of the new immigrants?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:细节题。第三段第二句提到,意大利人、罗马尼亚人以及其他所谓的劣等民族的人最后成为了美国人中的典范。第三句提到,没有理由不相信这些新移民也能取得这样的成功。由第三句的双重否定可知,作者认为新移民也能和他们的前辈一样成功,故B项为正确答案。
单选题 What does Edward Telles' research say about Mexican-Americans?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:细节题。第四段第四句提到,大部分美国黑人都深陷无望的贫困中,一事无成,Telles担心美籍墨西哥人可能也要步美国黑人的后尘。D项中的may forever remain poor and underachieving是对原文中的a seemingly permanent state of poverty and underachievement的同义转述,故D项为正确答案。
单选题 What should be done to help the new immigrants?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:推理题。倒数第二段第二句提到,我们不知道如何使美国化的过程对所有人行之有效。第四句提到,我们应该问些更广泛的有关“同化”的问题,即如何保证这些过去的局外人不会在这个国家永远处于边缘地位。由此可推断出,作者认为应思考并寻找方法,避免移民边缘化,故C项为正确答案。
单选题 According to the author, the burning issue concerning immigration is_________.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:主旨题。本题的答题依据在末段。该段首句提到,这(That)是一个更重要的问题。That出现在末段首句,是指示代词,指的是上段末作者提到的some broader questions about assimilation,about how to ensure that people,once outsiders,don’t forever remain marginalized within these shores。题干中的burning issue对应原文的broader questions和much larger question。B项的内容是对how to ensure that people,once outsiders,don’t forever remain marginalized within these shores的同义转述,故为正确答案。