Passage One

    The Roman language served as the first model for answering the question. Even to someone with no knowledge of Latin, the similarities among Roman languages would have made it natural to suggest that they were derived from a common ancestor. On the assumption that the shared characteristic of these languages came from the common ancestor, it would have been possible to reconstruct many of the characteristics of the original common language. In much the same way it became clear that the branches of the Indo-European family could be studied and a hypothetical family tree constructed, reading back to a common ancestor. This is the tree approach. The basic process represented by the tree model is one of divergence: when languages become isolated from one another, they differ increasingly, and dialects gradually become different until they become separate languages.
    Divergence is by no means the only possible tendency in language evolution. Johannes Schmidt introduced a 'wave' model, in which linguistic changes were like waves, eventually leading to convergence; that is, growing similarity among languages that were initially quite different.
    Today, however, most linguists think primarily in terms of familytrees. It is necessary to construct some models of how language change might occur according to a process-based view. There are four main classes of models.
    The first is the process of initial colonization, by which an uninhabited territory becomes populated; its language naturally becomes that of the colonizers. Second are processes of divergence, such as the linguistic divergence arising from separation or isolation mentioned above in relation to early models of the Indo-European languages. The third group of models is based on processes of linguistic convergence. The wave model, formulated by Schmidt in the 1870's, is an example, but convergence methods have not generally found favor among linguists.
    Now, the slow and rather static operation of these processes is complicated by another factor: linguistic replacement. That factor provides the basis for a fourth class of models, in many areas of the world the languages initially spoken by the indigenous people have come to be replaced, fully or partially, by languages spoken by people coming from outside. Were it not for this large complicating factor, the world's linguistic history could be faithfully described by the initial distribution of Homo Sapiens, followed by the gradual workings of divergence and convergence. So linguistic replacement also has a key role to play in explaining the origins of the Indo-European languages.
单选题     The characteristics of the original common language can be described on the basis of ______.
 
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】第一段以Roman languages和Indo-European family为例说明,通过考察同语系不同语言的共同特点,可构建a hypothetical family tree,以此追溯这些语言的共同起源。
单选题     According to Johannes Schmidt, ______.
 
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】关于语言演化,Schmidt提出a“wave”model,认为语言存在同化趋势,即:异化不是语言变化的唯一趋势。
单选题     It can be inferred from paragraph 4 that ______.
 
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】根据结尾句convergence methods have not generally found favor among linguists可知,同化理论并未得到语言学家的支持。
单选题     Which of the following is TRUE according to the passage?
 
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】最后一段结尾表明,linguistic replacement是解释the origins of the Indo-European languages的关键之一。因此,linguistic replacement的重要性不容忽视。但其他三种模式initial colonization, divergence和linguistic convergence同样很重要。
单选题     This passage is primarily written to ______.
 
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】文章以Indo-European languages的起源为例,围绕语言演化的趋势,对四种模式divergence, linguistic convergence, initial colonization和linguistic replacement展开讨论。