单选题
New Moral Philosophies or Not

In the next century we"ll be able to alter our DNA radically, encoding our visions and vanities while concocting new life-forms. When Dr. Frankenstein made his monster, he wrestled with the moral issue of whether he should allow it to reproduce, "Had I the right, for my own benefit, to inflict the curse upon everlasting generations?" Will such questions require us to develop new moral philosophies?
Probably not. Instead, we"ll reach again for a time tested moral concept, one sometimes called the Golden Rule and which Kant, the millennium"s most prudent moralist, conjured up into a categorical imperative: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; treat each person as an individual rather than as a means to some end.
Under this moral precept we should recoil at human cloning, because it inevitably entails using humans as means to other humans" ends and valuing them as copies of others we loved or as collections of body parts, not as individuals in their own right. We should also draw a line, however fuzzy, that would permit using genetic engineering to cure diseases and disabilities but not to change the personal attributes that make someone an individual (IQ, physical appearance, gender and sexuality).
The biotech age will also give us more reason to guard our personal privacy. Aldous Huxley in Brave New World, got it wrong: rather than centralizing power in the hands of the state, DNA technology has empowered individuals and families. But the state will have an important role, making sure that no one, including insurance companies, can look at our genetic data without our permission or use it to discriminate against us.
Then we can get ready for the breakthroughs that could come at the end of the next century and the technology is comparable to mapping our genes: plotting the 10 billion or more neurons of our brain. With that information we might someday be able to create artificial intelligences that think and experience consciousness in ways that are indistinguishable from a human brain. Eventually we might be able to replicate our own minds in a "dry ware" machine, so that we could live on without the "wet ware" of a biological brain and body. The 20th century"s revolution in information technology will thereby merge with the 21st century"s revolution in biotechnology. But this is science fiction. Let"s turn the page now and get back to real science.
单选题 Dr. Frankenstein"s remarks are mentioned in the text ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 细节考查题。题干考查的是本文引用弗兰肯斯坦博士所说的话的目的。答案参见第一段,且文章前三段都在反复强调“moral philosophies”,故选项D引入生物技术中所存在的道德问题的话题为正确答案。选项A、B、C的内容都不是作者引用的目的。
单选题 It can be concluded from the text that the technology of human cloning should be employed ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 推理题。题干考查的是我们从文章可以得出的结论:人类克隆技术应该使用的方式是什么。根据第二至四段可以归纳出该方式应该是合理的并且是相当谨慎的,故正确答案为B。
单选题 From the text, we learn that Aldous Huxley is of the opinion that ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 观点题。题干考查的是我们从本文得知,Aldous Huxley持有怎样的观点。根据题干返回原文第四段定位,选项A为正确答案。选项B、C的内容与原文相反;选项D的内容与问题不符。
单选题 Judged from the information in the last paragraph, we can predict that the author is likely to write which of the following in the next section?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 推理题。题干考查的是从全文最后一段推测,我们能预测下面哪项是作者在下一部分将要讲述的内容?最后一段指出20世纪信息技术的革命将同21世纪的生物技术革命融为一体。故选项D生物技术研究的现状为正确答案。
单选题 According to the last paragraph, "dry-ware" is to "wet-ware" as ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 猜词题。题干考查的是根据最后一段,“干件”和“湿件”的关系就像……。在文中“干件”指的是机器,“湿件”指的是人的肉体,故两者的关系就是机器和肉体的关系。正确答案为C。