单选题
{{B}}TEXT B{{/B}}

About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed a lawsuit (诉讼) in California claiming that the state's ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test. (They believed, correctly, that IQ tests are a valid method of evaluating children for special education classes. ) The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child's physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then tile style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know about any child's intellectual level, the better for the child in question.

单选题 Why did the intelligence test become unpopular in the past few decades?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】要点定位题。本题要求同义转述。文章第二段some thought it was unfair to minority children,说明有人认为智商测试对少数民族孩子不公平,也就是对少数民族学生的歧视,即B为正确答案。
单选题 The recent legal action taken by some black parents in California aimed to ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】细节理解题。诉讼中提到“政府禁止IQ测试是对他们(黑人儿童)的歧视,这样一来他们的子女就不可能进入特殊班级受教育”。指责其不公,自然是要把它取消,所以C项为答案。
单选题 The author believes that intelligence testing ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】从常识来判断,美国白人一般都认为黑人等少数民族的孩子愚钝不可教,因此不能进入特殊教育班级。智商的测试可以让人们清楚儿童在学校成绩不好到底是智力的问题还是其他原因to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence,or whether some other factor is the cause,这样就有可能排除智力上的因素,所以对缓和种族冲突会有好处,能表达此意思的是选项A。
单选题 The author's opinion of child adoption seems to be that ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】作者观点题。作者在提到儿童收养问题后指出"surely good will on the part of all of us is needed",显然是在说"cross-racial adoption is to be advocated。”因此,D项为正确答案。
单选题 Child adoption is mentioned in the passage to show that ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】要点理解题。对于具体事例的作用,一般可以看事例前面总括性的陈述。本篇文章作者在介绍儿童收养问题前提到"Unfortunately,intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject,and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time.”然后说这种情况在其他场合也出现,如儿童收养。显然儿童收养问题所要说明的也是对于一些敏感的问题,法律所允许我们做的在不同的时期也不同。开始白人家庭收养黑人儿童是受鼓励的,到后来又变得"generally unpopular",说明人们的观点会发生变化,因此D选项为正确答案。